Go back
Apology to Tmetzler

Apology to Tmetzler

General

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
You obviously.
Why didn't you finish your sentence?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by shavixmir
You should be nominated for the worst joke award.
You are right.

Blame the Milkman.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
The most revealing part of that endgame was that IM did not know the winning technique in a Queen v. Rook and Pawn ending and I had to blunder to give him a win when the technique is in most endgame books and would presumably be known to a super strong player.
Are you trying to say that the uber-engine user on here, who has presumably beaten countless engines with his engine, and has also beaten really strong players, who know how to successfully play against computers, doesn't have any tablebase installed in Junior???

Come on, lay of the meds.

D

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bowmann
Why didn't you finish your sentence?
you're such a stupid twat, bowmann. He just missed a comma!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Freddie2004
Just to clarify...are we publically accussing No1 of cheating here...go on Rag....report him, I would love to see what happened then.
No, I'm not. The post you quoted is to do with IM.

The previous post about 2Bit matching up 90% according to me, and 96% according to Arrakis, was just wondering why 2Bit felt the need to fiddle the analysis.

D

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Ragnorak
No, I'm not. The post you quoted is to do with IM.

The previous post about 2Bit matching up 90% according to me, and 96% according to Arrakis, was just wondering why 2Bit felt the need to fiddle the analysis.

D
I didn't; the results I got were what I got running a blundercheck with the variation set at "0" (something Ragnorak refused to do) on a Fritz8 at 32MB. The analysis was posted in the CC forum and had been previously sent to the Game Mods. You keep making up figures and why do you keep ignoring the fact that there is a game on Chesslab with the same moves up to White's 22nd??

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
I didn't; the results I got were what I got running a blundercheck with the variation set at "0" (something Ragnorak refused to do) on a Fritz8 at 32MB. The analysis was posted in the CC forum and had been previously sent to the Game Mods. You keep making up figures and why do you keep ignoring the fact that there is a game on Chesslab with the same moves up to White's 22nd??
Do you even know what the threshold means? Or we can call it 'variation', if you prefer.

D

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Ragnorak
Are you trying to say that the uber-engine user on here, who has presumably beaten countless engines with his engine, and has also beaten really strong players, who know how to successfully play against computers, doesn't have any tablebase installed in Junior???

Come on, lay of the meds.

D
Any really strong player can look at the endgame and judge for themselves. Obviously, you lack the knowledge. I don't know if there are tablebases covering Q v. R + P or not. All I know is that your super strong, better than Kasparov at correspondence chess IM, did not know the winning technique. It's in Fine's Basic Chess Endings as I stated in the other thread.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by shavixmir


Just like Bush is a hypocrite Christian fundamentalist, it seems, no1, that you are a hypocrite TOSSER.

Dear oh dear oh dear...

[b]Just because it's funny. And true
[/b]
This ignores you hypocrisy of course , of signing(and thereby agreeing with) the TOS when joining this site .

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by angie88
you're such a stupid twat, bowmann. He just missed a comma!
Interesting that a woman should choose that particular expletive for use as an insult.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Ragnorak
Do you even know what the threshold means? Or we can call it 'variation', if you prefer.

D
Yes, it's called threshold on Fritz8. Again as stated in the other thread, the way you did it left a significant drift of .75 pawns when supposedly all the proper moves were being made (virtually all forced). Why did you refuse to do the analysis over with the threshold set at "0"? And why did you also refuse to publish your analysis of the other game? What are you hiding, Ragnorak?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bowmann
Interesting that a woman should choose that particular expletive for use as an insult.
dick.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
Any really strong player can look at the endgame and judge for themselves. Obviously, you lack the knowledge. I don't know if there are tablebases covering Q v. R + P or not. All I know is that your super strong, better than Kasparov at correspondence chess IM, did not know the winning technique. It's in Fine's Basic Chess Endings as I stated in the other thread.
Obviously, but can you explain how a player who doesn't know basic endings and who also has an engine which is in no way optimised, can beat tonnes of other (optimised? ) engines, and engine beating players?

D

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Edwardipov
dick.
Yep. You missed the point.