26 May 16
via the internet, in private or public forums,
requires a stout heart, gonads, and a large bag of civility...
imagine if you will, a time traveling circus clown that only wanted the best from all of mankind,
but decided to eat humans instead...
thus was born immorality...
and those who lack civility, those whose immorality is so inflated that twenty sex dolls could never handle the load,
they are the ones for whom rules were created...
they are also the ones who bend, fold, spindle, and mutilate these very same rules...
disgusting subhumans...
party at my place, starts at 11pm, byob and yer own condoms...
26 May 16
Originally posted by rookie54That blurb was a bit vague.
via the internet, in private or public forums,
requires a stout heart, gonads, and a large bag of civility...
imagine if you will, a time traveling circus clown that only wanted the best from all of mankind,
but decided to eat humans instead...
thus was born immorality...
and those who lack civility, those whose immorality is so inflated that twenty se ...[text shortened]... es...
disgusting subhumans...
party at my place, starts at 11pm, byob and yer own condoms...
Who is on the invite list, exactly?
And why are you encouraging folks to Bring (Their) Your Own Bibles?
26 May 16
Originally posted by rookie54 (OP)Red Hot Pawn's General Forum: "General discussion. If it's off-topic, or you're not sure where to put it, put it here." ~Russ
via the internet, in private or public forums,
requires a stout heart, gonads, and a large bag of civility...
imagine if you will, a time traveling circus clown that only wanted the best from all of mankind,
but decided to eat humans instead...
thus was born immorality...
and those who lack civility, those whose immorality is so inflated that twenty ...[text shortened]... rules...
disgusting subhumans...
party at my place, starts at 11pm, byob and yer own condoms...
Does "arguing" promote "civility"?
Originally posted by wolfgang59Speaking of atlases, take a peak at some of those from the 70's (you know: when your folks were in their wonder years before puberty hit).
Because everyone's bible is different of course!
I think maybe we should all bring our own Atlases too.
They're an absolute hoot, how totally wrong they had Antarctica.
Those idiots made the smallish mass look absolutely continental.
26 May 16
Originally posted by rookie54I feel sorry for your imagination.
via the internet, in private or public forums,
requires a stout heart, gonads, and a large bag of civility...
imagine if you will, a time traveling circus clown that only wanted the best from all of mankind,
but decided to eat humans instead...
thus was born immorality...
and those who lack civility, those whose immorality is so inflated that twenty se ...[text shortened]... es...
disgusting subhumans...
party at my place, starts at 11pm, byob and yer own condoms...
Originally posted by FreakyKBHAntarctica can justifiably be described as "absolutely continental". After all, Australia is only about 7,700,000 km2 while Antarctica is 14,000,000 km2 so Antarctica is hardly a "smallish mass".
Speaking of atlases, take a peak at some of those from the 70's (you know: when your folks were in their wonder years before puberty hit).
They're an absolute hoot, how totally wrong they had Antarctica.
Those idiots made the smallish mass look absolutely continental.
If your complaint is about the difficulty of depicting a large area that is on a basically spherical object onto a flat 2-D map (and if your chief concern is area rather than shape), then you should perhaps simply promote the Gall–Peters projection.
Even as a kid looking at an atlas in the 70s, I was fully aware of the shortcomings of the Mercator projection with its huge Greenland and Antarctica etc. It's kind of funny to see you here - 40 years later - acting like you've got some kind of gotcha! about these issues. 😛