Originally posted by Nordlysoh noes! natsia's stuck in infinite regression! we must launch a search party to save her! I suggest a team consisting of a whale, an octopus-monster, a goat and an orangutang! animals to the rescue! I can't seem to be able to stop using exclamation marks!
Only a USCF GM would claim that!
Originally posted by JieI've never seen any evidence of chess knowledge from ya. Virtually the only posts you ever made in the Chess forum were complaints about cheaters being investigated - which you started doing from about the first day you started using this nick. You obviously don't know jack about ratings as shown by your senseless, shallow comments in the other thread and your "USCF GM" rants.
He famously claimed I [b]lack chess knowledge. Only a USCF GM would claim I lack chess knowledge but what is No1's USCF rating again? 2750? 2800?He must be up there with Nakamura. Perhaps he is a USCF National Master?[/b]
I suspect you have about as much actual chess knowledge as James Woodley.
Originally posted by no1marauderReally as much chess knowledge as James Woodley, (is that ure real name)? Remind us again of your ICC rating and your OTB rating and also quote your results from the RHP flag pole.
I've never seen any evidence of chess knowledge from ya. Virtually the only posts you ever made in the Chess forum were complaints about cheaters being investigated - which you started doing from about the first day you started using this nick. You obviously don't know jack about ratings as shown by your senseless, shallow comments in the other thread an ...[text shortened]... ts.
I suspect you have about as much actual chess knowledge as James Woodley.
I did not seem to be doing too badly on the RHP flagpole only losing to Heinzkat on time while up on material and I even posted a game from ICC where I was playing an IM (I have yet to see you comment on that game and show us a USCF GM's plan).
As far as cheating is concerned I made a u-turn after "overwhelming evidence" was shown to me, and also the OTB under-performances of some high-rated players here. They would have to be under-performing OTB if they can play at a high level on RHP.
Then again why would someone under-perfom OTB if he is a "star" here? I opened my own Jie-files and guess how many names are in the Jie-files?
Originally posted by Jiehow's that prose supposed to express your chess knowledge? you're still producing exactly zero weight.
Really as much chess knowledge as James Woodley, (is that ure real name)? Remind us again of your ICC rating and your OTB rating and also quote your results from the RHP flag pole.
I did not seem to be doing too badly on the RHP flagpole only losing to Heinzkat on time while up on material and I even posted a game from ICC where I was playing an IM (I have ye ...[text shortened]... is a "star" here? I opened my own Jie-files and guess how many names are in the Jie-files?
just like the other loudmouth z00t, who was all big talk but could never get higher than 1800.
Originally posted by JieMy ICC rating is real; anybody can claim they have a high rating on a site esp. when they have neglected to give their nick there. And besides cheating on ICC isn't unknown and it's easier for someone who has a couple of computers (know anybody like that?).
Really as much chess knowledge as James Woodley, (is that ure real name)? Remind us again of your ICC rating and your OTB rating and also quote your results from the RHP flag pole.
I did not seem to be doing too badly on the RHP flagpole only losing to Heinzkat on time while up on material and I even posted a game from ICC where I was playing an IM (I have ye ...[text shortened]... is a "star" here? I opened my own Jie-files and guess how many names are in the Jie-files?
Why comment on a blitz game where someone blunders into a mate? OK, here's my comment " Try not to make moves like your 26th one which loses immediately". Does that help?
Have the ballsz to just come out and accuse me of cheating; it's been done before on these forums. All you need is some actual evidence that it's true. Go for it.
Has I said, people with actual knowledge of chess know that there's a big difference between: A) Blitz; B) Standard (esp. OTB) and C) Correspondence Chess. To those lacking such knowledge, it seems incomprehensible that ratings could vary widely between these three types of chess. To anyone who has any actual experience, that someone might have quite different ratings in each is completely unremarkable.
Originally posted by wormwoodI cannot comment on other RHP players or why they never got above a certain level but are you suggesting for one second that all those above 1800 on RHP are legitimate?
how's that prose supposed to express your chess knowledge? you're still producing exactly zero weight.
just like the other loudmouth z00t, who was all big talk but could never get higher than 1800.
Did you say you were 1200 on ICC or is No1 1200 on ICC? You do not get a rating of 2000> at bullet, blitz and standard unless you have some chess knowledge. (That chess knowledge is more than that of wormwood and No1 combined). Even kids get ratings over 2000 on ICC, why should one have a big mouth everywhere except OTB?
Originally posted by no1marauderI will ask you the $64,000 dollar question - Why should one have a big mouth everywhere except OTB?
My ICC rating is real; anybody can claim they have a high rating on a site esp. when they have neglected to give their nick there. And besides cheating on ICC isn't unknown and it's easier for someone who has a couple of computers (know anybody like that?).
Why comment on a blitz game where someone blunders into a mate? OK, here's my comm ...[text shortened]... nce, that someone might have quite different ratings in each is completely unremarkable.