Originally posted by DoctorScribblesAll I can say to the last 2 posts is...
Of course it will, if Phlab's position has any hope of not crumpling under contradiction, and not planting its foundation on a political soapbox from which all other views and values are deemed inferior, with the administration of ...[text shortened]... sive. I find you offensive for finding me offensive." -- Mathers
Rainman is one of my favorite songs on Encore.
Other than that... Good points.
P
Thought of one more thing to say... alert the posts if they are that bad.... and we can work from there.
So, another user bites the dust by popular vote and gets permenantly banned off the island because ppl do not like them and beleive by his/her removal, Utopia will strike the forums and ppl will live in peace! *snickers* Where have we seen this before in RHP history? Other Dodger's will come and go in this site, there are already a fair share of people who offend me by doing the following that no1 mentions, this doesn't seem very constitutional mod policy to me, it seems like people can just be voted out off popular beliefs. This campaigning to boot people off, if anything, should be against the TOS itself and it has been the most abusive process by far in the history of this site the past year and it's STILL going. If you come across somebody you don't like, simply rack up a few friends, make a case, and he/she is as good as gone, this happens all the time. Why waste time with such sillyness? The community should focus on banning chess cheaters who hide in the shadows, like any other respected chess site does, not focus on banning people who cause controversy in silly little forums. You guys should use your priorities better.
Originally posted by ExiledThis why I would not allow non-subscribers to post in the forums.
So, another user bites the dust by popular vote and gets permenantly banned off the island because ppl do not like them and beleive by his/her removal, Utopia will strike the forums and ppl will live in peace! *snickers* Where have we seen this before in RHP history? Other Dodger's will come and go in this site, there are already a fair share of people who o ...[text shortened]... people who cause controversy in silly little forums. You guys should use your priorities better.
Is Exiled=Dodger11? more than likely
Let guests play 6 games, no forums no tournies,
if they want more let them pay like the rest of us
🙂
Originally posted by no1marauderJust a note, another thing that bothers me is every time there is one subject, everyone shouts about the other bad things about RHP... I don't have every answer about everything... I can only say what is going on with dodger at this point.
Will this "banning people who talk about hate" policy extend to some of our posters who regularly post homophobic statements and slurs? Will it include those who voice the sentiment that all those who do not share their religious beliefs will be eternally punished by God? Finally, will it include those of us who publicly post that we hate playi ...[text shortened]... inst the Center Counter or the Caro-Kann?
In Clarificationship,
2BitLawyer
I feel there is no room for dodger here at RHP, simply because he was warned about it and keeps it up.... Russ has said he feels the same way, and I stand by that. Next come the freedom fighters who want a solution to everything... yet do nothing to help. Don't ask me what Russ wants, you ask him.
I am thinking perhaps I should just not offer my insight anymore, and let you guys wonder what is going on... I give info so you guys might have an idea of what is going on, and it is MY credibility on the line for doing so.
See ya's.
P
Originally posted by PhlabibitCan we ever get that Hall of Shame that Kirksey was talking about? It's getting difficult to remember who's banned and for what; a scorecard type feature with appropriate boxes for check marks ( "Cheater" "Hater" "Jerk" etc.) would make it much easier. Even Sir Ulrich is getting his banned people confused!
Matulose... do you also want to be banned again? Just wondering.
P
PS And yes, Exiled, something should certainly be done about "people lurking in the shadows"!
PPS Phlabby, you know I don't alert and my reasons for not doing so. I recognize that the mods and site admins get conflicting advice from different people on the site and that you can't please everybody but I have my beliefs and I stick to them even if it means putting up with posts I find vile. That's my position and I've been consistent with it (and it's somewhat ironic for you to advise DrScribbles to "alert posts", don't ya think😲).
Originally posted by SirUlrichWell, I did pay a while ago (a year ago actually) and got bloody banned anyways for posting on the forums, essentially ripped off, so your point is mute. I'll pay AGAIN when these serious issues are adressed properly.
This why I would not allow non-subscribers to post in the forums.
Is Exiled=Dodger11? more than likely
Let guests play 6 games, no forums no tournies,
if they want more let them pay like the rest of us
🙂
Originally posted by BlobbyDidn't you say you were leaving? Bobbly, take my advice, if you want to leave the forums, just leave, don't get baited into such mess, and at your young age you are especially vulnerable to such baits. RHP comes down heavily on retaliators and does nothing against the culprits/agressors in most cases, ie: those who start agressive posts, the defender who replies always gets hit harder, it's the stupid corrupt penalty policy that exists in the NHL, and we all know what happened to the NHL so far.
this thread should be closed now, the thread topic has no meaning anymore as he's already gone, and verytihng that has been wrote lately isoff-topic, goodnight! 😠
Originally posted by ExiledDisagree.
Didn't you say you were leaving? Bobbly, take my advice, if you want to leave the forums, just leave, don't get baited into such mess, and at your young age you are especially vulnerable to such baits. RHP comes down heavily on retaliators and does nothing against the culprits/agressors in most cases, ie: those who start agressive posts, the defender who re ...[text shortened]... corrupt penalty policy that exists in the NHL, and we all know what happened to the NHL so far.
It is those who are unaware of how (or simply unable) to conduct themselves properly in a public forum who end up getting banned.
A.
Hmmm, have not read the racier posts by Dodger11 that probably were removed; but I just read through all of his posts at this site that are left. I did not see anything too offensive, and actually it was pretty entertaining to read. They (powers that be) must have removed tons of stuff that she/he posted because I did not see anything remotely worth banning a person for in there; or at least no more offensive as some member’s postings that are overlooked. Did this person go on a racist rampage here? Ah, nevermind....where is my torch and pitchfork.
Mike
Originally posted by SirUlrichI agree! A person who commits nothing to the site has nothing to lose in their investment.
This why I would not allow non-subscribers to post in the forums.
Is Exiled=Dodger11? more than likely
Let guests play 6 games, no forums no tournies,
if they want more let them pay like the rest of us
🙂
Originally posted by no1marauderThank you, #1. It is indeed an excellent idea that would contribute greatly to the site in terms of content and creativity. Maybe a skull and crossbones beside their name. And maybe once a year we could have the "Barabbas Contest" where we vote back one member of the past year who has been banned.
Can we ever get that Hall of Shame that Kirksey was talking about? It's getting difficult to remember who's banned and for what; a scorecard type feature with appropriate boxes for check marks ( "Cheater" "Hater" "Jerk" etc.) would make it much easier. Even Sir Ulrich is getting his banned people confused!
PS And yes, Exiled, something s ...[text shortened]... (and it's somewhat ironic for you to advise DrScribbles to "alert posts", don't ya think😲).
