Originally posted by ivangriceNeither.
Gilts or T-Bills?
Sean Connery or Pierce Brosnan?
We will know ye by your answer...
Roger Moore was the greatest Bond. His smarmy, over-the-top pseudo-suave behaviour has me in stitches everytime I see him. While his Bond may have lacked the machismo associated with action/spy flick protagonists, his ridiculous overacting more than compensated in the entertainment department.
Originally posted by darvlayI agree.. I think Roger Moore was the better Bond..
Neither.
Roger Moore was the greatest Bond. His smarmy, over-the-top pseudo-suave behaviour has me in stitches everytime I see him. While his Bond may have lacked the machismo associated with action/spy flick protagonists, his ridiculous overacting more than compensated in the entertainment department.
yeah that guy.. thinggie.. he was the best.. when he eeyeh.. eeaahmm..
that time.. yeah.. was the best..
reckon its 007 for gents and 008 for ladies? wonder when they get a 008
than 007's that acts like a proper fat lady heroically kickin villains butt by
eating all their food and starve them to death..
butttaa.. that guy was amaazin.. he just did it for me.. forget the..
eeeaa and the.. maazin i tell ya.. cool as a penguin buildin sandcastles
on Pluto..
jeeebus.. wadday is dis..?!!
I love OHMSS as a film, but George Lazenby could not fill the shoes of Sean Connery. I think that with a few more movies, Lazenby could have been the best Bond, but he gave up too soon.
Roger Moore has to be the worst James Bond. He was far too cheesy to bring any substance to the role.
Best to worst:
Connery, Brosnan, Lazenby, Dalton,-------------->Roger Moore