I think both are important. Experience is essential, and well-written
books will explain the more important points and objectives to be
aware of during the different stages of a game.
I am hopeful that this post will encourage some of the players on this
site to contribute their opinion concerning which books would be
benificial.
I agree with Dant, as far as the books that cover someones games,
with explanations of the moves. I suppose they are useful to more
advanced players, but they are not that useful to someone who is just
figuring out the basics.... Marc
I think it is important. Practise the theory you have learned and you
will be more experienced using it. I have just recently found this site
and haven't played so many games. I have been winning because
most of my opponents haven't known opening theory and lost
material early. One of the biggest mistakes is to move your queen to
early. I have seen there is a site with the theory on openings. Can't
remember the address at the moment, if wish I can look for it.
Paul
Marc,
It wasn't that bad; was it? Just kidding. I didn't know opening, mid
and end game ideas or skews, forks, discovered attacks or pins until I
read a few books. I probably used these concepts but did know they
were actual methods.
I found the Microsoft Press series helpful. Esspecially the "Stratagies"
book. It helped me plan ahead. However, I think you do that well.
"Win at Chess" by Ron Curry was very interesting. He had good
chapters devoted to Opening, Midgame, Endgame , Pawn promotion
(smile) and more.
I went to Borders and browsed. I stay away from the boks that just
show games and explain them. I needed more basic help. Browse
some books and find one you find helpful.
Our games have been challenging. I guess they are going to get
more challenging.
Daniel
I am not sure I should tell you about this book, will probably have
tougher time winning. :-)
One of the best books about learning chess is "Chess: The Complete
Self-Tutor by Edward Lasker".
It is an interactive book in that he explains different situation than put
up a position giving you several alternatives. You get good
explanation both when you answer wrong and when you answer
correctly. It is a different approach to learning chess by books in that
you are active learning it.
Paul