Go back
Better Posters Deserve Better Treatment!

Better Posters Deserve Better Treatment!

General

Vote Up
Vote Down

so how many of you are wrestling with this little frog now?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ancientfrog
so how many of you are wrestling with this little frog now?
You're a wicked troll, buddy! Give yourself a big blue ribbon!

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ancientfrog
so you agree I'm at least as bitter as you?
My participation in the forums is not a quest to attack a group of people. I participate in discussions about music, film, philosophy, politics, economics, spirituality, football and also in the unqualified threads that populate general.

Sure, I hit hard (or try) once in a while. But that's not the sole, nor main, purpose of my visits to this forums.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by darvlay
More Red Night speak. Does he program you to record his favourite TV shows too?
Again...

Am I in violation of the TOS. Am i doing anything that I should not be allowed to do as a subscriber? If you don't want people you don't like responding to your threads then you can leave the public forum and start your very own special club. Plenty of others have done it, not just the TSM, and it seems to work.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Palynka
My participation in the forums is not a quest to attack a group of people. I participate in discussions about music, film, philosophy, politics, economics, spirituality, football and also in the unqualified threads that populate general.

Sure, I hit hard (or try), once in a while. But that's not the sole, nor main, purpose of my visits to this forums.
then go post something meaningful.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by darvlay
You're a wicked troll, buddy! Give yourself a big blue ribbon!
does it have a large gold star too?

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ancientfrog
then go post something meaningful.
I thought trying to reason with you was meaningful. Don't you agree?

Edit - But I guess I should just have stuck with my initial advice...

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ancientfrog
I'm not "running" anywhere phlabs. You will have to put more effort into "bullying" me out of the public forums.
This is 'bullying'.

Originally posted by ancientfrog
So you subscribe to a chess site for the forums only. That seems pathetic. Did you get banned for life from AOL or something?

Originally posted by ancientfrog
They are your words. Besides, I couldn't put words in your mouth even if I wanted to. There isn't any room left. Your foot is in the way.

All I've done is post FACTS.

P-

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

I gonna need to have another heart-to-heart with Red. The poor quality of his subordinates is simply unacceptable. He's complained about it before but I think it's about time he did something about it.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Phlabibit
This is 'bullying'.

Originally posted by ancientfrog
[b]So you subscribe to a chess site for the forums only. That seems pathetic. Did you get banned for life from AOL or something?


Originally posted by ancientfrog
They are your words. Besides, I couldn't put words in your mouth even if I wanted to. There isn't any room left. Your foot is in the way.

All I've done is post FACTS.

P-[/b]
FACTS just the FACTS

yay!

Sgt. Friday would be proud of you.

This routine of yours is stale. You know the routine.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ancientfrog
FACTS just the FACTS

yay!

Sgt. Friday would be proud of you.

This routine of yours is stale. You know the routine.
😴


Originally posted by Palynka
I thought trying to reason with you was meaningful. Don't you agree?

Edit - But I guess I should just have stuck with my initial advice...
I've seen your method of reasoning before.

Here, lets try this and we'll keep with Darvlay's origional topic of the post.

do you think an elite group of people should be afforded any special privileges on this site? If yes, who determines the people in that elite group? Will a committee be created? Who appoints the committee?

Should we simplly make it a matter of paying a premium? This would seem to diminish Darvlay's goal of better treatment for better posters as money would simply dictate who receives "better" treatment.

If we should leave things as they are then you can choose not to read or respond to any my posts in the general forum. Even those directed at yourself. If I violate the TOS, you can alert me. There are mechanisms in place to deal with anyone who violates the TOS.

Otherwise, the price of a public forum is accepting the participation of those you may wish to exclude.


Originally posted by Phlabibit
😴
yes phlabbs, this means you have run out of witty things to say and have no further arguments and find yourself once again painted into a logical corner.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Oh froggie, all this attension. Are you enjoying?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ancientfrog
I've seen your method of reasoning before.

Here, lets try this and we'll keep with Darvlay's origional topic of the post.

do you think an elite group of people should be afforded any special privileges on this site? If yes, who determines the people in that elite group? Will a committee be created? Who appoints the committee?

Should we simp ...[text shortened]... e price of a public forum is accepting the participation of those you may wish to exclude.
Do you think darvlay was serious?