Campaign to get Bad wolf laid

Originally posted by Bad wolf
Depends how you view it, they could get more taxes from legalising these drugs and lower taxes/not need to raise taxes, in other areas. 🙂

Taxing the drugs means the user will have to pay more for their supply?

You sure you have thought this one out?

Originally posted by Bad wolf
Depends how you view it, they could get more taxes from legalising these drugs and lower taxes/not need to raise taxes, in other areas. 🙂

And what would be the medical expenses to the NHS when this drug "free for all" kicks in ?

Originally posted by rmacken
Taxing the drugs means the user will have to pay more for their supply?

You sure you have thought this one out?

Perhaps, I certainly wouldn't want them to be lower.

Originally posted by Bad wolf
Perhaps, I certainly wouldn't want them to be lower.

why? taxes in this country are a joke.

Originally posted by huckleberryhound
And what would be the medical expenses to the NHS when this drug "free for all" kicks in ?

I would hope that it would be less than the money saved from having to combat drug crime.
I don't know, best thing we could do would be to look at other places that have done this, like The Netherlands, and see how we can compare, before committing to anything.

Originally posted by trevor33
why? taxes in this country are a joke.

In Tibet?

really?

😛

Originally posted by trevor33
why? taxes in this country are a joke.

Go on then, explain yourself. 🙂

Originally posted by Bad wolf
Go on then, explain yourself. 🙂

you'll notice when you start working, how much money your paying for what is and will aways to an inadequate service.

Originally posted by Bad wolf
I would hope that it would be less than the money saved from having to combat drug crime.
I don't know, best thing we could do would be to look at other places that have done this, like The Netherlands, and see how we can compare, before committing to anything.

All the netharlands has shown, is how it can make a profit on the habits of other countries. Considering the normally reserved nature our young (and old, for that matter) for alcohol and banned substances, i'd reckon that using Holland as an example is a white elephant.

How about instead of legalising dope, all the dopes who take it grow up and save their money for hospital insurance, or house insurance, rather than burdening the tax payer with their ineptitude ?

Originally posted by rmacken
In Tibet?

really?

😛

yes 😛

Originally posted by trevor33
you'll notice when you start working, how much money your paying for what is and will aways to an inadequate service.

It will always be inadequate with such low taxes. 😉

I think we should redistribution income, I think taxes are especially high for those on low incomes, perhaps even for middle incomes, but those on high incomes aren't at all; the burden is unfair.
Vote Liberal Democrat! 😉

Originally posted by Bad wolf
It will always be inadequate with such low taxes. 😉

I think we should redistribution income, I think taxes are especially high for those on low incomes, perhaps even for middle incomes, but those on high incomes aren't at all; the burden is unfair.
Vote Liberal Democrat! 😉

The rich get richer and the poor get well...... poorer!

Originally posted by huckleberryhound
All the netharlands has shown, is how it can make a profit on the habits of other countries. Considering the normally reserved nature our young (and old, for that matter) for alcohol and banned substances, i'd reckon that using Holland as an example is a white elephant.

How about instead of legalising dope, all the dopes who take it grow up and s ...[text shortened]... ital insurance, or house insurance, rather than burdening the tax payer with their ineptitude ?

Your suggestion would be difficult to enforce. 😛