Celebrities We Can Do Without

@divegeester said
Perhaps you’re just bored and irritated with me as usual.

Not bored.

@wolfgang59 said
Not bored.

Just irritated then, I get it, but it's affecting your thinking 😛

@torunn said
I think we can easily do without all TV-celebrities who believe their personal dramas are important to anyone else outside their own families.

I watched two episodes of the Kardashians to see what all the fuss was about. At every opportunity their expensive, rented skiing lodge name was advertised in print on the screen and as for the Kardashian conversations? What a load of pretentious nonsense as the women engaged in a lengthy chat about a boyfriend with dramatic close ups and the seriousness of someone receiving a diagnosis of a terminal disease. I also looked up images of Kim’s backside. It looked huge, flat and lardy in faded jeans; not something any young woman ever need aspire to.

@drewnogal said
I watched two episodes of the Kardashians to see what all the fuss was about. At every opportunity their expensive, rented skiing lodge name was advertised in print on the screen and as for the Kardashian conversations? What a load of pretentious nonsense as the women engaged in a lengthy chat about a boyfriend with dramatic close ups and the seriousness of someone receivin ...[text shortened]... e. It looked huge, flat and lardy in faded jeans; not something any young woman ever need aspire to.

"MEOW"!!!!! 🤔 😲 😉

@great-big-stees said
"MEOW"!!!!! 🤔 😲 😉

MJAU...?

@divegeester said
I’m not sure what your point is other than expressing your subjective perspective on Tom Cruise, which of course you are entitled to. But your claims about his acting ability isn’t conclusive when one considers the evidence.

My point is that it is not only my opinion; others agree with me. So he's got some awards, and not all of them are coveted; that's someone's opinion, too. In matters of taste, there is no objective truth.

@moonbus said
My point is that it is not only my opinion; others agree with me. So he's got some awards, and not all of them are coveted; that's someone's opinion, too. In matters of taste, there is no objective truth.

God is objective. (I read it in Spirituaity forum.)
And he says Cruise stinks.

@wolfgang59 said
God is objective. (I read it in Spirituaity forum.)
And he says Cruise stinks.

For the sake of of this thread, let's assume there is a God. Has it's "sex" been determined?

@great-big-stees said
For the sake of of this thread, let's assume there is a God. Has it's "sex" been determined?

Whitey says he's Caucasian. Sex male.

@mudfinger said
Whitey says he's Caucasian. Sex male.

Bulger?

@great-big-stees said
For the sake of of this thread, let's assume there is a God. Has it's "sex" been determined?

for the sake of argument,
let's say god is male and he has a dick...
the only reason he would have such an appendage is if there were an equally omnipotent female god, sporting the holy pussy...
and if THAT were true,

then there's gonna be a pack of immortal rugrats running around...

@great-big-stees said
Bulger?

No, Canadians.

@rookie54 said

then there's gonna be a pack of immortal rugrats running around...

A pantheon would be so much more interesting!