I read once an article in a management magazine about an experiment with two female chimpansees. The one was trained to learn the
chess game (meaning to learn to apply the rules in making moves), the other one checkers. The chess ape was quite succesful: apart
from castling, en passant and promotion, she could do all moves, and liked capturing pawns and pieces a lot. Not so with the checkers,
the ape did not understand how to capture by jumping over the enemy piece, and could not play a game.
What does that tell us? That female apes my beat deep blue one day? Or that chess is a primitive game compared to checkers? Or do
some cheaters in RHP use in fact their pets to make the good moves?
Maybe the checkers learning chimp was too bored by an inferior game
to learn it!
I only say this because I know that in general the nonhuman primates
are quite good at strategy games! After all, I run all my moves past
my good friends Koko and Washoe, who are far better chess tacticians
than I. Of course one has to interpret, which can be tricky, and I think
occasionally I've misunderstood there generally sound advice.
Queen queen bishop take bad. Lose apple bad bad.
Rook Queen take bannana good.
Knight Queen King trap. many banana many good.
Michael play like black bug play checkers. No banana. No apple.
FYI, don't ask a cat for chess advice. Oh sure, they understand the
game with exquisite subtlety, but they prefer laying on top of the
computer monitor, staying warm, chortlling at one's poor chess ability.
Willing to point out your blunders after the fact, but no help in the
heat of battle.