Originally posted by redbadger Robbie Carrobie was awesome at trolling, Andy Andy is awesome at pissing on every ones chips.
RedRobbie's posts made it into the Recommended Posts folder more often than anyone else's--thing is, they were almost never his posts directly, but rather the butts of someone else's replies to his in(s)anities.
Originally posted by moonbus RedRobbie's posts made it into the Recommended Posts folder more often than anyone else's--thing is, they were almost never his posts directly, but rather the butts of someone else's replies to his in(s)anities.
Originally posted by moonbus Requesting clarification.
1. Is “Best Troll” a good thing or a bad thing? A compliment or a disparagement? Is a “Best Troll” an agreeably amusing spammer or an obnoxious and insulting one?
2. Which brings me to my next question. Must a candidate be currently actively posting? Two of the most vocal posters earlier this year (SwissGambit & RedRobbie) have dropped off the radar. Should there be / can there be posthumous nominations?
1. I think somebody forgot to raise the irony flag again.. The "best" troll is the mots obnoxious.
2. That would be a great category: most missed formerly active poster.