Go back
Common Link

Common Link

General

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
Each site is identical. Same users, same games. No difference. They just provided a different look to the same site. For example, chess at work is more suitable for playing, you guessed it, at work! (Where your boss might be about...)"
Are you suggesting that chessatwork is designed to deceive your employer?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by HandyAndy
Are you suggesting that chessatwork is designed to deceive your employer?
Perhaps your curiosity will be satisfied when you read the reply to your Feedback to the Sole Proprietor of Red Hot Pawn.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
Perhaps your curiosity will be satisfied when you read the reply to your Feedback to the Sole Proprietor of Red Hot Pawn.
Feedback to the sole proprietor? When did that happen?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by HandyAndy
Feedback to the sole proprietor? When did that happen?
HandyAndy's Impaired Vision Self Diagnostic Options:

a) Distorted?

b) Unfocused?

c) Blind? As in the old proverb: "None are so blind as those who will not see."

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Great King Rat
Err... Don't think so. What happened on that day?

Edit, upon googling I'm thinking you might've found it.
HeiNER, or the Heidelberg Named Entity Resource, which is "a freely available multilingual lexical Named Entity resource extracted from Wikipedia". operating under the auspices of Heidelberg University, extracted those five names from Wikipedia on 15th August 2008.

Vote Up
Vote Down
-1

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
HandyAndy's Impaired Vision Self Diagnostic Options:

a) Distorted?

b) Unfocused?

c) Blind? As in the old proverb: "None are so blind as those who will not see."
Why not offer a list of names of people who are linked in some mysterious or not immediately obvious way?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
Why not offer a list of names of people who are linked in some mysterious or not immediately obvious way?
Once again for the final time: this thread is all about categories of online forum behavior, not "a list of the names of people" online or offline.

Vote Up
Vote Down
-1

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
Once again for the final time: this thread is all about categories of online forum behavior, not "a list of the names of people" online or offline.
I think you are mistaken. Take a look at Ghost of a Duke's OP and see what people have been engaged in on this thread.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
Once again for the final time: this thread is all about categories of online forum behavior, not "a list of the names of people" online or offline.
I guess now we know which one of us is distorted, unfocused and blind.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
Why not offer a list of names of people who are linked in some mysterious or not immediately obvious way?
I'd love to - but every time I think of something it's just too google-easy for words.

Vote Up
Vote Down
-1

Originally posted by Kewpie
I'd love to - but every time I think of something it's just too google-easy for words.
Okey dokey...

Wilma Sproke
Varney Gretch
Pleef Joon
Patrick Armlow
Jane de Bolough

Vote Up
Vote Down

can it be numbers?
here's a list that has something in common
134
445
212
746
933

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
... this thread is all about categories of online forum behavior, not "a list of the names of people" online or offline.
Opening Post

Maria Sharapova
Oprah Winfrey
Liam Gallagher
Anne Boleyn

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
Once again for the final time: this thread is all about categories of online forum behavior, not "a list of the names of people" online or offline.
Sorry Grampy but i think you have misunderstood why i created this thread. (Perhaps you are confusing it with another?)

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by lemondrop
can it be numbers?
here's a list that has something in common
134
445
212
746
933
Yes, the common link can be numbers, but the solution won't be coming from me. 🙂