Had a discussion with a friend of mine the other day about whether or not NASA faked going to the moon some 30ish years ago. She was adamant that it was all a hoax, while I suggested it was all kosher. The following attempts to counter some of the main charges held by those who think it's all one big conspiracy theory: http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html
Anyways, it got me thinking about how I, several years ago, was fascinated with the circumstances surrounding the assassination of President Kennedy.
Any conspiracy theorists out there?
Originally posted by T1000personally i think that in 1969 they didnt land an the moon. But have landed on the moon since then (in 1 of the 9 apparent landings.
Had a discussion with a friend of mine the other day about whether or not NASA faked going to the moon some 30ish years ago. She was adamant that it was all a hoax, while I suggested that it was all kosher and 'real'. The following attempts to counter some of the main charges held by those who think it's all one big conspiracy theory: http://www.badastronom ...[text shortened]... ances surrounding the assassination of President Kennedy.
Any conspiracy theorists out there?
The problen is that over 100,000 people helped make parts/or put them together etc. so iut would be impossible to get all of them not to say it was a hoax. so i think it must have happened even though i dont believe it.
David
yes the landing was a hoax, there is just too much evidence to show this.
NASAs counter claim just holds no wieght with me they never give ne prove that they did land on the moon.
so how do u beleive?
He who cries hoax
-or-
They who together cry hoax, and then show the evidence
I know who my moneys with.
my thinking is this, the shuttle was real, A landing happened, but not with neil and buzz. what we got up there is not a landing site, but an observation post or mility outpost, or research station.
also we saw niel and buzz suit up, then we saw 2 suited people board the rocket, our brains are lazy and accepted those 2 people as buzz and neil but they were not.
as we watched them board the rocket, the real neil and buzz headed down to a studio. from now on live feed from the studio and shuutle, were edited along with some premade footage, then sent to us...
thats what i think ne way, it fits the evidence, and what be easier than to hoax the whole thing
Originally posted by nktwildI'd like to hear you tell Neil and Buzz that it was a hoax and they never whent up to the moon, I might come see you in the Hospital 🙂
yes the landing was a hoax, there is just too much evidence to show this.
NASAs counter claim just holds no wieght with me they never give ne prove that they did land on the moon.
so how do u beleive?
He who cries hoax
-or-
They who together cry hoax, and then show the evidence
I know who my moneys with.
my thinking is this, the shuttle was real, ...[text shortened]... thats what i think ne way, it fits the evidence, and what be easier than to hoax the whole thing
why ould they hoax it?
-Adam
personally, i don't really care if we went to the moon or not-IMO it's a waste of money. also-isn't there some sort of energy layer outside of the earths atmosphere that would kill anybody that was in the rocket? also-if it was a hoax wouldn't the Russians have said so at the time with the cold war, space race etc? saying that-the probubly did, but anyway...😛
Originally posted by jgvaccarolol,
It seems blatantly obvious to me that the moon landing was real. I think people who believe the landing was a hoax must on some level want it to have been a hoax.
The credulity of our species really knows no bounds....
the guy with a free headed headed monkey cries out on nasa's side.
so then,
y is it, that on the televised footage showed the american flag flapping, as if in wind, when the moon has no atmsophere?
y where there multiple shodaws cast by the astronaughts when there is only one light source?
and y is it that even the most powerful telescope cannot see the flag placed on the moon?
and i already siad y it was hoaxed adam, because they set something else up on the moon that they dont want us to know about.
The great thing about these sort of hoaxes is that first, u must uncover the hoax, then u must prove its existence, then u must work out y the hoax was instigated, then search for proof of that. By this time only the most hardcore conspiracy types are sniffing around, the kind that nobody believes neway.
genius, as i said, that rocket did land on the moon, that was no hoax, the only hoax was WHO landied on the moon with WHAT equipment and WHAT was their purpose.
thats y russia didnot speak up, their detection system watched the rocket head to the moon, break up and land. they like us, then assumed that the astronaughts in the lander were neil and buzz.
If neil and buzz really went to the moon, they would produce evidence if i confronted them, not resort to phsyical violence, so often the defence of a guilty mind
Originally posted by nktwild
y is it, that on the televised footage showed the american flag flapping, as if in wind, when the moon has no atmsophere?
Its not flaping it starched so it looks like it is
y where there multiple shodaws cast by the astronaughts when there is only one light source?
A shadow for each person and object (if thats not it show me a pic)
and y is it that even the most powerful telescope cannot see the flag placed on the moon?
who told you that? it would be kind of hard to find but you could see it
and i already siad y it was hoaxed adam, because they set something else up on the moon that they dont want us to know about.
The great thing about these sort of hoaxes is that first, u must uncover the hoax, then u must prove its existence, then u must work out y the hoax was instigated, then search for proof of that. By this time only the most hardcore conspiracy types are sniffing around, the kind that nobody believes neway.
---PS----
Learn To Spell... y is not why
because im lazy, its easier just to put y
adman, no offence but television footage does not mean still pictures, when a flag flaps it flaps the movent of the flag is a real givaway
since when does multiple sudenly mean one? each person and object cast 3 shadows, thats 2 more than should b
it would not be hard to find, the footage of the landing/walk shows where the flag is... suprise suprise, its not there, neither is there ne evidence of the landing
btw, when the lander leaves the moon, u c its rockets fire up, yet as it taes off, no loonar dust is blasted away, and the ground is not scortched... strange that
Originally posted by nktwild
because im lazy, its easier just to put y
adman, no offence but television footage does not mean still pictures, when a flag flaps it flaps the movent of the flag is a real givaway
I have seen the video footage and the flag does not flap
since when does multiple sudenly mean one? each person and object cast 3 shadows, thats 2 more than should b
There are also lights on the Luner Lander and the light from the sun
it would not be hard to find, the footage of the landing/walk shows where the flag is... suprise suprise, its not there, neither is there ne evidence of the landing
Look, there is footage
btw, when the lander leaves the moon, u c its rockets fire up, yet as it taes off, no loonar dust is blasted away, and the ground is not scortched... strange that
are you sure? maby you havent seen the same footage as I have
- Joined
- 20 Oct 02
- Moves
- 599502
Originally posted by T1000I am definitely convinced that Oswald was not alone Mark, theres too much out there to back it up.
Had a discussion with a friend of mine the other day about whether or not NASA faked going to the moon some 30ish years ago. She was adamant that it was all a hoax, while I suggested it was all kosher. The following attempts to counter some of the main charges held by those who think it's all one big conspiracy theory: http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxap ...[text shortened]... ances surrounding the assassination of President Kennedy.
Any conspiracy theorists out there?