Originally posted by FreakyKBHSo you figure thrump who lashes out without thinking, is better equiped to lead? Thrump is a sociopath, that is clear. Also Narcissistic. He is a mental basket case. Which is the MO of a lot of CEO's.
So she escapes indictment, but is revealed to be as careless and clueless as possible.
That's leadership?
18 US Code 793 Section F:
(f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense,
(1) through GROSS NEGLIGENCE permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or
(2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
SHALL BE FINED UNDER THIS TITLE OR IMPRISONED NOT MORE THAN TEN YEARS, OR BOTH.
18 U.S. Code § 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information
Dear God in heaven, I will get a thumbs down with a post like this.
Er....um....get over it right wingers Move along, nothing to see here.
Originally posted by sonhouseIts the two bottles scenario, one you know will kill you (Hillary) and one you dont know if it will kill you but it might (Donald) which are you gonna choose?
So you figure thrump who lashes out without thinking, is better equiped to lead? Thrump is a sociopath, that is clear. Also Narcissistic. He is a mental basket case. Which is the MO of a lot of CEO's.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieLooking at Hillary's accomplishments as Secretary General, you already know what is in the bottle.
Its the two bottles scenario, one you know will kill you (Hillary) and one you dont know if it will kill you but it might (Donald) which are you gonna choose?
Originally posted by whodey"(1) through GROSS NEGLIGENCE permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or
18 US Code 793 Section F:
(f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense,
(1) through GROSS NEGLIGENCE permits the same to be rem ...[text shortened]... th a post like this.
Er....um....get over it right wingers Move along, nothing to see here.
(2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—"
I don't see how this applies. Email, through it's very nature, does not have a "chain" of custody. It's more like a "cloud" of custody. They were not "removed", nor were they "delivered to anyone in violation of its trust". Neither were they "lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed", and those that were deleted were not "relating to the national defense".
So, again, I don't see how this applies.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieAs you well know, if your premise is false, then your entire argument fails.
Its the two bottles scenario, one you know will kill you (Hillary) and one you dont know if it will kill you but it might (Donald) which are you gonna choose?
Who, exactly, has Hillary killed?
