@A-Unique-Nickname saidIt appears there is a good chance you have turned all the ANIMAL rights lovers against you old chap! π
If people are stupid enough to own an animal which can kill them they deserve what happens. If the animal kills someone else, lit them on fire with a litre of petrol.
-VR
@Very-Rusty saidWhy?
It appears there is a good chance you have turned all the ANIMAL rights lovers against you old chap! π
-VR
@A-Unique-Nickname saidBecause of this statement you made. Animal lovers may not take it well. I know you are a bit of a wild card, but not everyone does. π π
Why?
"If people are stupid enough to own an animal which can kill them they deserve what happens. If the animal kills someone else, lit them on fire with a litre of petrol."
-VR
@Very-Rusty saidOh, I think you read it as the animals should be burned when in fact I meant the owners.
Because of this statement you made. Animal lovers may not take it well. I know you are a bit of a wild card, but not everyone does. π π
"If people are stupid enough to own an animal which can kill them they deserve what happens. If the animal kills someone else, lit them on fire with a litre of petrol."
-VR
A number of years ago (about 3) during my βdrug delivering roundsβ, I was attacked by two big German Shepherds, one of which punctured the back of my thigh. The owners, a large lady and a slight man, managed, with some stick beating and my help, to restrain the beasties. The authorities were called and in spite of the two having had their shots, the dogs not the owners, were quarantined for two weeks as a precaution. I went to the hospital, having my wound attended to and was back at it the next day. I recently noted that the dogs are no longer at that home. π I now carry dog treats.π
@A-Unique-Nickname saidActually I believe the owners would not like you promoting the idea that they be burnt. That is almost like saying if your kid were do kill someone you should in return be killed. That eye for an eye thing doesn't seem to be working around the world at the present time as I see it.
Oh, I think you read it as the animals should be burned when in fact I meant the owners.
Sure the owner should be responsible for what their pet does but, setting them on fire is a bit on the harsh side in my opinion not to mention breaking several laws.
-VR
@Great-Big-Stees saidHave you ever had to use the treats? Things like that don't happen often, at least around my neck of the woods. Smart idea though!
A number of years ago (about 3) during my βdrug delivering roundsβ, I was attacked by two big German Shepherds, one of which punctured the back of my thigh. The owners, a large lady and a slight man, managed, with some stick beating and my help, to restrain the beasties. The authorities were called and in spite of the two having had their shots, the dogs not the owner ...[text shortened]... the next day. I recently noted that the dogs are no longer at that home. π I now carry dog treats.π
-VR