Go back
Dantes

Dantes

General

Vote Up
Vote Down

Who did he lose to????????????????????????????

Vote Up
Vote Down

Check the thread "Quite a run!".

I also believe that there's one thread about this in the "only chess" forum as well.

-Jarno

Vote Up
Vote Down

by clicking on a players name, you get their profile, from there you can view the games they have played

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by TDR1
Who did he lose to????????????????????????????

Feivel, by TO

Vote Up
Vote Down

Well Dantes, for the longest winning streak RHP will prolly ever see,
Here's to you!!!
😉

Vote Up
Vote Down

one question though...how does one exactly lose by a move timeout?
they were only on move #19.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

I watched the game. Feivel had the right to ask TO but look at the match: Feivel was LOSING. Maybe a good player but NOT sportif player. I can understand if u ask TO immediately if u are in a winning position but in this situation i consider it a big antisportif way to play. According to me chess is different. Sorry
Cristina

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by conticchio
I watched the game. Feivel had the right to ask TO but look at the match: Feivel was LOSING. Maybe a good player but NOT sportif player. I can understand if u ask TO immediately if u are in a winning position but in this situation i consider it a big antisportif way to play. According to me chess is different. Sorry
Cristina
If you were in a tournament otb battling for the top spot, and your opponent was kicking your butt all over the board, but his flag dropped....would you petition the judge??? I would not. The time out is an integral part of the game.
Saying the game was unfair would be silly.

Mike

Vote Up
Vote Down

Christina,

I will gladly play anyone here (first come first serve) an unrated game from the position in question to stop all this idiotic speculation that I was losing. The only advantage white had is the advantage of the opening move if he had that much. So come on and try me, I would really like to be shown. If anyone is unwilling to take me up on this offer they had best remain silent or risk looking like fools.

Feivel the Freethinker

Vote Up
Vote Down

If no mistakes were made feivel would win.
Around move 40.

Vote Up
Vote Down

I think the TO was justified, but i'd like to see a rematch...

It could be like a superbowl spectacular

Feivel the TO taker vs Dantes the wounded tiger.

We could have running commentary and take bets! A featured game with all the excitement of a hollywood plot!!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by rapalla7
If no mistakes were made feivel would win.
Around move 40.
Begging your pardon, on what is this theory based? Edmond was a little better in my opinion.

Olav

Vote Up
Vote Down

The computer at that position has Edmond with a ridiculously small advantage

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by TimmyToilet
The computer at that position has Edmond with a ridiculously small advantage
Computers can't play chess... but I guess some people disagree with me on this point...

Olav

p.s. I'm sorry, I forgot I was on Red Hot Pawn and not at Time for Chess, my Internet is down, so I'm using my dad's computer...

Vote Up
Vote Down

Before this becomes a debate on who hsad an advantage if any, a word from one (or both) of the participants is in order. Edmond Dantes did have (in my opinion) an advantage that is based on white having the first move. To be put bluntly it was NOT a loss but most probably a draw.

Feivel the Freethinker