Originally posted by Grampy Bobby [b]Update: (2 of 2 as of Monday, February 7, 2016)
"The RHP (More) Inclusive Oscars" Original post by Subscriber FMF "on 23 Jan '16 12:07" Thread 167188
Russ, since this Red Hot Pawn General Forum thread above, no less than a total of sixty six (66) total threads
have been constructed by FMF during the past forty ...[text shortened]... by one site member during less than seven weeks (44/7 = 6.3 weeks)?
___________________________[/b]
Do you think it qualifies as spamming or trolling?
Originally posted by Grampy Bobby [b]Update: (2 of 2 as of Monday, February 7, 2016)
"The RHP (More) Inclusive Oscars" Original post by Subscriber FMF "on 23 Jan '16 12:07" Thread 167188
Russ, since this Red Hot Pawn General Forum thread above, no less than a total of sixty six (66) total threads
have been constructed by FMF during the past forty ...[text shortened]... new threads by one site member during less than (44/7 = 6.3 weeks)?
___________________________[/b]
Stop whining. Good grief you're like a little girl.
"About me: (quotes from a small group of mean-spirited religionists in the RHP forums)
Son of Satan
Worse than Satan
Diabolical
Morals of a lynch mob murderer
Troll
Liar
Evil
Systematic torturer
Actual sadist
Enemy of God
Christian basher
Underminer of other people's faith
Deserving of burning in hell for eternity
I'm a normal guy who happens to be a Christian and who happens to disagree with this small group of partisan Christians on the internet.
Not my work, but enjoy Red Hot Pawn Creatures: http://sfrhp.blogspot.co.uk"
Originally posted by JS357 If Russ wills that it results in your and GB's posts doing a sort of matter-antimatter annihilation, neither of you can ever hope to do better. 🙂
I'm happy for my posts to be the ones that matter in a matter-antimatter dichotomy. 😛
I don't mind if any one poster creates a lot of threads, so long as they become interesting threads - my definition of interesting means, no interminable lists, no personal attacks, and a topic I may want to respond to. Variety is good.
Originally posted by Kewpie I don't mind if any one poster creates a lot of threads, so long as they become interesting threads - my definition of interesting means, no interminable lists, no personal attacks, and a topic I may want to respond to. Variety is good.
I have heard nothing from Russ yet ~ no sanction or reprimand ~ about the threads I've started.
Originally posted by Kewpie I don't mind if any one poster creates a lot of threads, so long as they become interesting threads - my definition of interesting means, no interminable lists, no personal attacks, and a topic I may want to respond to. Variety is good.
Originally posted by Kewpie Hang on, GB, weren't you threatening FMF with something because he'd started a lot of threads?
Originally posted by Kewpie "I don't mind if any one poster creates a lot of threads, so long as they become interesting threads - my definition of interesting means, no interminable lists, no personal attacks, and a topic I may want to respond to. Variety is good." (bold mine)
___________________
Kewpie, "threatening FMF"? No.
Simply asked Russ whether or not this volume of threads in less than seven weeks was acceptable with reference to RHP Forum Guidelines. Furthermore, I'm not here to threaten anyone; only to enjoy being with my friends and almost friends while I'm still able to access the worldwide internet. Regards, GB
It sounded like a run-to-the-teacher exercise to me. If FMF has created a lot of threads, are they interesting threads? That's the test. Russ isn't interested in General forum chitchat, you should have realised that by now. Forums are the least of his concerns.
Originally posted by Grampy Bobby [b][I] simply asked Russ whether or not this volume of threads in less than seven weeks was acceptable with reference to RHP Forum Guidelines./b]
And has Russ declared it "acceptable" or "unacceptable", or has he chosen to simply ignore you?