@ghost-of-a-duke saidI didn't "provoke" Executioner Brand into making his vile posts. You obviously did not witness the exchanges that ended with him getting banned. He was comparable to a roaring drunk chaney3. You'd have seen that IF you had witnessed the exchanges.
Provocation, not weaponizing.
Please don't embellish.
@fmf saidNo. When you asked me how many, at least 7 came to mind. (2 of which could possibly be the same person, but not certain).
In other words, you have a secret list of seven secret victims that is the basis for trying to denounce me in public. Or is it "six" now that your nonsense about chaney3 turned out to be a dud? How many more duds are there on your secret list?
@ghost-of-a-duke saidYour misremembered nonsense about chaney3 turned out to be a dud? How many more duds are there on your secret list of [now] six?
See above.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidAnd you know the names of these seven? And chaney3 is STILL one of them? Or you've struck him off the list now?
No. When you asked me how many, at least 7 came to mind. (2 of which could possibly be the same person, but not certain).
@ghost-of-a-duke saidAnd yet it's surely a serious accusation you are making.
I didn't misremember the exchange. I just mixed up the chuckle brothers.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidWhat was the thread called?
Yes, it wasn't pleasant. I probably alerted. (I think that thread, or a similar one, was completely removed by the mods).
@ghost-of-a-duke saidI think that thread, or a similar one, was completely removed by the mods
Yes, it wasn't pleasant. I probably alerted. (I think that thread, or a similar one, was completely removed by the mods).
You are now going to widen your accusations to include things on threads that you claim were deleted?