-Removed-Hold.
Now u are combining these two different things.
The lorry driver on the M6 was suspected to have caused that families death by dangerous driving. The man/woman is not guilty untill proven otherwise, so you may not judge or shoot a bullet in his face, yet.
The Romanian driver, that you are calling an idiot (i assume you are not calling the lorry driver an idiot because you simply cant know), did not cause any accident. He could have caused a big accident because of his rather loose driving style and he should be judged on that, sure. But he cant be judged on things he didnt do (kill ppl).
There are alot of ppl who occasionally drive faster then the speed limit (maybe even yourself too), this can also be very dangerous and can also cause death. Do you think every person driving to fast should get a bullet in the head?
Let me summarize this:
- Lorry driver: Can not judge him since we dont know anything about it.
- Romanian driver: Should be judged, but a bullet true the head is to harsh.
-Removed-omg, you do it again, you start to combine "lorry" with "video". Two different things... I consider this confusing and would like to kindly ask you if you could please either talk about Romanian driver, or Lorry driver. ty.
I assume you are talking about the Romanian driver in this case, cause its the only one on video.
I agree that he is endangering ppls lives, as i also said in my previous post he should be judged for that: "- Romanian driver: Should be judged,"
I was disagreeing with you when you said that he should get a bullet in the head for this (you later edited this away), and that that was not to harsh. It is to harsh, he didnt kill anyone...
I also said this in my previous post: "but a bullet true the head is to harsh."
"then STFU."
I might consider S-tingTFU if you add a 'please'🙂
-Removed-...please?😛
"Yes I would kill that guy in the video without a second thought if whilst doing what he was doing (dancing in his cab) caused my dearest to die. And if it was you doing it and killed my dearest, I'd kill you too."
I agree, same for me. Maybe id not kill the person but torture first.
The thing is that you combined the two different things in your head, then posted about it.
- lorry driver who was suspected to have caused death
- romanian driver who didnt cause death, but did drive crazy
your outcome:
Crazy driving ppl who cause death should get a bullet in the head.
Then i replyd that neither of these two cases by itself (you combined them)should get the drivers a bullet in the head.
If you can agree on this i will su, promise🙂
Originally posted by Raven69No, not someone, his dearest.
So basically you would kill someone because they killed someone and you believe that killing someone is wrong?
If someone kills someone i believe he/she should go to prison for life or something similar.
If someone kills my dearest id want them to suffer the same, or probably want them to suffer even more.
Originally posted by zozozozoDouble-standard, much? Everyone is someone's dearest. Are you saying if someone hurts you personally they deserve harsher punishment than if they hurt someone else?
No, not someone, his dearest.
If someone kills someone i believe he/she should go to prison for life or something similar.
If someone kills my dearest id want them to suffer the same, or probably want them to suffer even more.
Originally posted by Raven69"Everyone is someone's dearest."
Double-standard, much? Everyone is someone's dearest. Are you saying if someone hurts you personally they deserve harsher punishment than if they hurt someone else?
But not everyone is my dearest🙂
"Are you saying if someone hurts you personally they deserve harsher punishment than if they hurt someone else?"
No, im not saying they deserve harsher punishment, im saying i would want to give them harsher punishment.