@divegeester said
Rather than “attack” (please note I’m using petewxyz’s understanding of the word) Very Rusty, why don’t you alert his posts and complain to the site administration?
You seem to think that it’s ok for YOU to “attack” another poster but you complain when someone else questions you in a similar way. Maybe it’s because you see Very Rusty as a legitimate target being the ge ...[text shortened]... ise your own behaviour while simultaneously vilifying posters like myself who are not in you clique.
"Rather than attack... why don't you..."
The First Amendment applies to everyone, even those who don't know what they're talking about. Even you. The task before the rest of us is deciding who is right, and who is full of s---.
"Maybe... if that is the case."
This is how you give the truth your particular brand of short shrift and minimization. You include the gist here, but then you blow it off.
"...and I don't object..."
Oh, but you do.
"...rationalize and legitimize..."
More "blowing it off".
"... villifying posters like myself..."
Again, consider it a public service.
"...who are not in your clique."
Again, you assign, as my motive, the wrong reason, merely to assauge your feelings and your clouded view of your own "morality". By this one phrase, you de-legitimize your entire rant, since what it is based on is mere fabrication. There is a reason you are not in my "clique" and that is your own questionable behavior, not any "lack of principle" on my part. In fact, you are not "in my clique"
because of my principles. Your behavior, condensed in this one post you made, is why I differ from you, and why I find you rather odious. It is your holding your "forum combat" techniques, learned from other shady posters on this site, above your own principles, which is what results in the degradation of those same principles, assuming you ever had any.
Now leave me alone and go kick your dog or something, since, you know, you're not in
his clique, either.