Go back
Entertain me!

Entertain me!

General

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Palynka
How do you feel after this entertainment? šŸ˜•
It's positively Shakespearian, although the Fool's role is oversubscribed.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bosse de Nage
It's positively Shakespearian, although the Fool's role is oversubscribed.
Let's kickstart the real entertainment:


Starrman, thou fobbing ill-nurtured vassal! Spam thy not lest the foruma be flecked with thy folly-fallen feast of fowlness!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Palynka
Let's kickstart the real entertainment:


Starrman, thou fobbing ill-nurtured vassal! Spam thy not lest the foruma be flecked with thy folly-fallen feast of fowlness!
You are just jealous because you weren't invited to the wedding.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Nordlys
You are just jealous because you weren't invited to the wedding.
Obviously. Hence my spit spouting seediness.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Nordlys
You are just jealous because you weren't invited to the wedding.
Murder sub-plot starts here.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Palynka
Obviously. Hence my spit spouting seediness.
All awful alliteration antics are abhorrent.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Starrman
All awful alliteration antics are abhorrent.
May you be subjected to the pecks of the emo emu and the kicks of the grizzled Gothic goat.

Vote Up
Vote Down
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Starrman
All awful alliteration antics are abhorrent.
In the most Bowmann-esque way, don't you mean 'assonance' as opposed to 'alliteration' ?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Daemon Sin
In the most Bowmann-esque way, don't you mean 'assonance' as opposed to 'alliteration' ?
He abhors alliteration, so of course he didn't use it. Is that sooooooo hard to understand?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Nordlys
He abhors alliteration, so of course he didn't use it. Is that sooooooo hard to understand?
** BONK **

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Daemon Sin
[b]** BONK ** [/b]
oink

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Daemon Sin
In the most Bowmann-esque way, don't you mean 'assonance' as opposed to 'alliteration' ?
Incorrect.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Bowmann
Incorrect.
Elaborate.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Daemon Sin
Elaborate.
It's obvious, isn't it? What Palynka wrote was an alliteration. That was what Starrman objected to. He objected in form of an assonance.