Originally posted by AThousandYoung"Overly sexually provocative" is already qualified as being too much, so I guess it's tautologically true. But what does that imply for beautiful people? Do you think they all qualify as being "overly" or not?
No, but being overly sexually provocative is unprofessional and demonstrates a lack of respect for the work being done IMO.
If not, then all the automatic link between beauty and unprofessionalism falls apart.
Originally posted by PalynkaWell no kidding. The "automatic" link doesn't exist.
"Overly sexually provocative" is already qualified as being too much, so I guess it's tautologically true. But what does that imply for beautiful people? Do you think they all qualify as being "overly" or not?
If not, then all the automatic link between beauty and unprofessionalism falls apart.
1 edit
Originally posted by PalynkaBut he's right. Being "overly sexually provocative" IS unprofessional.
Hey, genius, then you should be agreeing with me and kicking ATY's behind.
Not all beautiful people are "overly sexually provocative".
Therefore not all beautiful people are unprofessional, so you are right too. But you were the one making some kind of link between "beautiful people" and "overly sexually provocative" (or at least accusing him of making the link, which he was not).
The whole issue turns on what is the definition of "overly sexually provocative". I say when your teasing crosses the line into unprofessionalism, then that's when you're being "overly". It's not yet against the law to be beautiful. But hiring and firing is up to the business, so it's their definition that counts.
Originally posted by SuzianneGod, you're stupid.
But he's right. Being "overly sexually provocative" IS unprofessional.
Not all beautiful people are "overly sexually provocative".
Therefore not all beautiful people are unprofessional, so you are right too. But you were the one making some kind of link between "beautiful people" and "overly sexually provocative" (or at least accusing him of making t ...[text shortened]... hiring and firing is up to the business, so it's their definition that counts.
Originally posted by mikelomOriginally posted by Very Rusty
Oh! So A FAT ass isn't?
A blonde who does sweet fa is better than a married lovely woman, who is amazingly good at her job.
Hum?
Let's all go for the Blonde, hey? 😛
A pretty face at the reception desk is good for business!
Just for Mike, I think everyone else got it.
- Joined
- 10 Jan 08
- Moves
- 23349
Originally posted by mikelomwhy can't a woman with A FAT ass have a pretty face?
Oh! So A FAT ass isn't?
A blonde who does sweet fa is better than a married lovely woman, who is amazingly good at her job.
Hum?
Let's all go for the Blonde, hey? 😛
plus, blond? please.
i'd love to know who rec'ed that.