Originally posted by sonhouseYou would think so, huh?
So you must have been desperately googling your flat Earth buddies to find the rational for Coriolis force and couldn't find it. Since there IS no rational for that.
I'm going to shred that counter in due time, so I wouldn't get ahead of myself, were I you.
You have your hands full just trying to keep up with the challenges I've put to you... and that doesn't even consider the your lack of response to cognitive dissonance.
Curious, that.
Originally posted by FreakyKBHSo you have no answer to Coriolis. That figures since there IS no answer to that if flat Earthers insist Earth is not spinning.
You would think so, huh?
I'm going to shred that counter in due time, so I wouldn't get ahead of myself, were I you.
You have your hands full just trying to keep up with the challenges I've put to you... and that doesn't even consider the your lack of response to [b]cognitive dissonance.
Curious, that.[/b]
Good luck rationalizing that one.
You are the one with cognitive dissonance not me. I actually read books and have made some discoveries on my own along the way.
Originally posted by sonhouseSo let's talk about those discoveries at some point, shall we?
So you have no answer to Coriolis. That figures since there IS no answer to that if flat Earthers insist Earth is not spinning.
Good luck rationalizing that one.
You are the one with cognitive dissonance not me. I actually read books and have made some discoveries on my own along the way.
In the meantime (and before I shred your pitiful attempt at redirecting the topic to yet another rabbit hole in a vain effort to distract from your lack of response on all the issues put to you) why not explain how you got cognitive dissonance wrong.
Majorly wrong.
1 edit
Originally posted by FreakyKBHPeople can take a look at your attempt to prove the earth is flat decide for themselves: here Thread 165913.
So let's talk about those discoveries at some point, shall we?
In the meantime (and before I shred your pitiful attempt at redirecting the topic to yet another rabbit hole in a vain effort to distract from your lack of response on all the issues put to you) why not explain how you got [b] cognitive dissonance wrong.
Majorly wrong.[/b]
Originally posted by FMFOh, you mean that one where you and others like you tried to deny the very real fact that the horizon is always at eye level?
People can take a look at your attempt to prove the earth is flat decide for themselves: here Thread 165913.
That thread?
You are advised (like it or not, take it or not, it means little to me) to do at least a modicum of research before pointing people's attention to the zit on your nose.
Originally posted by FreakyKBHWell, as I say, people can decide for themselves and they can also see for themselves why it is you get so flustered every time the link to that thread is provided. 😉
Oh, you mean that one where you and others like you tried to deny the very real fact that the horizon is always at eye level?
That thread?
You are advised (like it or not, take it or not, it means little to me) to do at least a modicum of research before pointing people's attention to the zit on your nose.
Originally posted by FreakyKBH1. Eye-level? What does that mean. Nothing to do with height since both I and the man standing on my shoulders can look at the same horizon.
Oh, you mean that one where you and others like you tried to deny the very real fact that the horizon is always at eye level?
That thread?
You are advised (like it or not, take it or not, it means little to me) to do at least a modicum of research before pointing people's attention to the zit on your nose.
2. In a flat-Earth there would be no horizon. The earth and sky would get closer and closer together but never meet.
3. Why put pineapple on a perfectly good pizza?
Originally posted by FreakyKBHHere is one you can't explain in your flat Earth mythology:
Oh, you mean that one where you and others like you tried to deny the very real fact that the horizon is always at eye level?
That thread?
You are advised (like it or not, take it or not, it means little to me) to do at least a modicum of research before pointing people's attention to the zit on your nose.
http://phys.org/news/2016-05-nasa-image-mercury-transit.html
Mercury getting between us and the sun. Hmm. But the sun is supposed to only be about 1000 miles from Earth. So why can't we just see mercury all the time and much bigger than a tiny spot in the sky?
Originally posted by sonhouseI think a lot of flat earthers would say that mercury isn't a planet
Here is one you can't explain in your flat Earth mythology:
http://phys.org/news/2016-05-nasa-image-mercury-transit.html
Mercury getting between us and the sun. Hmm. But the sun is supposed to only be about 1000 miles from Earth. So why can't we just see mercury all the time and much bigger than a tiny spot in the sky?