Originally posted by trev33"[It is meant] in a bad way. Spelling it "gay" may seem homophobic to some, so to avoid certain unpleasantries one can add an extra "g". That makes it all better and brings much lulz to all the idiots who read it." - Raven
i'll take this as a complament.
what did raven say and i'll translate it into trev.
Originally posted by no1marauderIf only I had the time, to read threads, of which you were a part of, and to see just how many people agreed with your sentiments. I suspect, it only took one person, to disagree with you, even though with sending feedback, you still felt, it was a dead cert, that the Administrators, would be compelled to believe in your argument, what you deemed sufficient, to justify, the continued use of an Avatar, in a profile....to be told publicly, in the forum itself, that one half of the Administrators, found it 'inappropriate' as well.
Denying things that are on their face absurd is a pointless exercise.
I'd say "bemused" is a lot more accurate to describe my state of mind regarding Chris' comment at this point. Though I still think the taking down of the avatar of Kunta Kinte as "offensive" is an embarrassment to the site.
That you would find it almost abhorrent, that your beliefs, your opinion, is totally disregarded. You felt an injustice was done to you.
Originally posted by PhlabibitYes I do, thanks 🙂 If they have a green light, then I do.
Again, this is a public forum. You don't have a green light to say what you wish in public without hearing from others.
As for your past participations with this user, that's not my concern. You should use feedback if you were so offended rather than attacking users based on past correspondence with them.
It was rude.
P-
I should have asked already : Is this Phlabibit the RHP user talking to me? or is this Phlabibit the Moderator, talking to me?
Please, there has to be a clear and concise distinction, of who is actually talking. One Phlab cannot change to another, to suit, what he has to say.