Originally posted by Elamef37If he wants to stalk off the site because he got a Forum ban that he knew he was going to get for behavior that he knew was unacceptable on the site, that's up to him. Why anybody would act like it's some tragedy is beyond me.
He's allowed too. Much the same as you feel it is appropriate to feel upset about the 'injustice' given to Sushill
You really don't know what "upset" is, at least in my context.
Originally posted by Elamef37You really don't know anything about me.
LOL
Unlike you, in which I suspect, I won't betray a confidence. What was said to me in private, is private, unless the other party feels, he can enlighten you
If it's soooooooooooooooo secret, you shouldn't even intimate anything about it in the General Forum. You really don't have a clue about confidentiality.
Originally posted by no1marauderHow I put things in 'context' is completely different to what you do. Don't compare me to you, believing you to be more intellectual than myself.
If he wants to stalk off the site because he got a Forum ban that he knew he was going to get for behavior that he knew was unacceptable on the site, that's up to him. Why anybody would act like it's some tragedy is beyond me.
You really don't know what "upset" is, at least in my context.
Originally posted by no1marauderYou, alluded to wanting to know something, which I felt, and I justified, that I will not betray a confidence. Please do not insult my intelligence.
You really don't know anything about me.
If it's soooooooooooooooo secret, you shouldn't even intimate anything about it in the General Forum. You really don't have a clue about confidentiality.
Originally posted by Elamef37Regardless of how "intellectual" you might think you are, the fact remains that your arguments are incoherent and based on little more than your personal feelings.
How I put things in 'context' is completely different to what you do. Don't compare me to you, believing you to be more intellectual than myself.
Originally posted by Elamef37I alluded to nothing of the sort.
You, alluded to wanting to know something, which I felt, and I justified, that I will not betray a confidence. Please do not insult my intelligence.
The game you are playing is suggesting that Sushill in some way supports your position without explicitly saying so. That is betraying his confidence either way. IF you really considered PMs so confidential, you wouldn't make thinly veiled suggestions of their content.