I have had the experience twice now where a female player starts to play chess in a conventional manner, and then shifts into dirty talk. I find this some what strange. I would never of imagined a chess site turning into a cyber sex experience. It doesn't bother me, but I do find it odd. It also throws my game off a bit. Chess can get a little stuffy, and the spice of a woman talking filth to me does ad a new dimension to the game.
Originally posted by buckkyWrong.
I have had the experience twice now where a female player starts to play chess in a conventional manner, and then shifts into dirty talk. I find this some what strange. I would never of imagined a chess site turning into a cyber sex experience. It doesn't bother me, but I do find it odd. It also throws my game off a bit. Chess can get a little stuffy, and the spice of a woman talking filth to me does ad a new dimension to the game.
It does bother you,so admit it.
Women don't get the same time slots.
That is it.
The dirty talk I will not except.
Anyone(you) can say anything about any sect,creed gender,religion or whatever.
If I was writing your post I wouuld have written player.Why Inflame with female.Why?Why?Don't any mods think about taking this away.
Why is it so importatant that a male player could have got away with this?
You are a fraud.
This is a clean site.
Go get a wash you pervert.
Linda
Originally posted by missleadwell put
Wrong.
It does bother you,so admit it.
Women don't get the same time slots.
That is it.
The dirty talk I will not except.
Anyone(you) can say anything about any sect,creed gender,religion or whatever.
If I was writing your post I wouuld have written player.Why Inflame with female.Why?Why?Don't any mods think about taking this away.
Why is it so imp ...[text shortened]... got away with this?
You are a fraud.
This is a clean site.
Go get a wash you pervert.
Linda
-trekkie
Originally posted by buckkyWe have an opening in The Apostles for her. Kirk
I have had the experience twice now where a female player starts to play chess in a conventional manner, and then shifts into dirty talk. I find this some what strange. I would never of imagined a chess site turning into a cyber sex experience. It doesn't bother me, but I do find it odd. It also throws my game off a bit. Chess can get a little stuffy, and the spice of a woman talking filth to me does ad a new dimension to the game.
Originally posted by kirksey957He shall be Called…
Uh.... I missed that one. But I will keep working on the connection. Kirk
Reading: Matthew 1.18-25
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The story is told that years ago a census collector was going from house to house to determine the number of residents in the area. He came to one house and said to the woman who answered his knock, "How many people live in this house?" "Well," she answered, "there's Johnny and Jamie and Tommie. Then there's Mary and Amy. Then there's..." The census collector was getting impatient. "Stop!" he said."I don't need to know the names, only the numbers!" "But, sir," she replied, "they don't have numbers, only names!"
These days, of course, we have several numbers - a tax-file number, a social security number, a medicare number, a PIN number and several others besides. But are you a name or a number? Are you a person or a computer file? Do you have identity, character and importance?
Parents have always attached importance to the naming of their children. Sometimes before the day of birth they have carefully picked out two names - boy and girl. But when the baby is born, they have reconsidered because they didn't think the chosen name fitted their newborn baby!
Names are chosen for a number of reasons. If you'd like some fancy words for these reasons, we can call them ancestral, emulative and euphonic. Put in simpler terms, names are sometimes given for family reasons - a traditional family name, the name of a parent or grandparent. Names are sometimes given because of someone who is admired - a film or football star, a politician, royalty... Names are also given because they "sound nice".
In Bible times a name was far more than a personal label. It was closely associated with the person's character, with the circumstances of their birth, with the promises of what they are to be. The importance of the name is seen in cases where names were changed. So Abram's name ("exalted father"😉 is changed to Abraham ("father of many"😉 (Gen.17.5). Jacob the cheat became Israel the one who struggles with God (Gen.35.10). Simon the listener became Peter the rock (Jn.1.42). These names were all far more significant than our use of names. They spoke of divine promise, character and life's work.
"What are you going to call him/her?" is a question frequently asked of new parents. "But, sir, they don't have numbers, only names!" It is interesting to reflect that, soon after his birth, Jesus was counted. For their census purposes the Roman officials were only interested in numbers, not names! But you can't relate to a number! What are you going to call him?
Get the connection?
Linda
Originally posted by missleadMaybe there names weren't changed in real life.
The importance of the name is seen in cases where names were changed. So Abram's name ("exalted father"😉 is changed to Abraham ("father of many"😉 (Gen.17.5). Jacob the cheat became Israel the one who struggles with God (Gen.35.10). Simon the listener became Peter the rock (Jn.1.42).
Quite often fictional authors impart their characters with names with hidden or not so hidden meaning, especially in the past with esoteric aspects to everything.
Did you know that Adolf means wolf? Funny that.
1 edit
Originally posted by Varg
Maybe there names weren't changed in real life.
Quite often fictional authors impart their characters with names with hidden or not so hidden meaning, especially in the past with esoteric aspects to everything.
Did you know that Adolf means wolf? Funny that.
Originally posted by buckkyWHOEHAAA!Who is she?Will she play me?😛
I have had the experience twice now where a female player starts to play chess in a conventional manner, and then shifts into dirty talk. I find this some what strange. I would never of imagined a chess site turning into a cyber sex experience. It doesn't bother me, but I do find it odd. It also throws my game off a bit. Chess can get a little stuffy, and the spice of a woman talking filth to me does ad a new dimension to the game.
Originally posted by missleadI'm sorry, but it seems your post is having a go at the original poster? All he was doing was commenting on the bizarre tactics of some ‘female’ players here. If it happened to me I'm sure I'd mention it with some amusement too.
Wrong.
It does bother you,so admit it.
Women don't get the same time slots.
That is it.
The dirty talk I will not except.
Anyone(you) can say anything about any sect,creed gender,religion or whatever.
If I was writing your post I wouuld have written player.Why Inflame with female.Why?Why?Don't any mods think about taking this away.
Why is it so imp ...[text shortened]... got away with this?
You are a fraud.
This is a clean site.
Go get a wash you pervert.
Linda
Unless I misunderstood your post completely (and if I did please say so) you're saying that a male player would have got away with doing the same thing that these ‘female’ players are doing. But the fact of the matter is while the original poster seems more amused than offended about this; a female player likely would have been a lot more offended. In other words the original poster seems quite relaxed about the whole deal.
Calling him a fraud and a pervert for pointing out a rather funny habit of some supposedly female players here seems rather pointless and inflammatory.
Originally posted by dylI'd have to agree. The guy (or girl??) just said he/she thought it was odd, but misslead has automatically turned it into an issue of sexism. A man talking dirty to a woman wouldn't be so lightly taken, so in fact the reverse is true that in this case the women seem to have an advantage.
I'm sorry, but it seems your post is having a go at the original poster? All he was doing was commenting on the bizarre tactics of some ‘female’ players here. If it happened to me I'm sure I'd mention it with some amusement too.
Unless I misunderstood your post completely (and if I did please say so) you're saying that a male player would hav ...[text shortened]... er funny habit of some supposedly female players here seems rather pointless and inflammatory.
And if it makes people play worse maybe I should try it...