@eye-of-horus-42 removed their quoted postNo offense, but that's maybe the dumbest thing I've heard yet.
@eye-of-horus-42 removed their quoted postHi,
I would count myself an infromed layman on Ancient Egypt history.
Sources on Achenaton or Amenophis IV are sparse, one reason is that hetried to transform the society in a rush.
The Bible is not very rich in tangible historic marks either, so we don't really know what Pharo was assumed to be the adversary of Mose.
You can always piece together some story from what you have in a sparsley sourced environment. So yes some aspects of what we know from Echnaton seem to be compatible with jewish theology.
Yes Mose was described to be a prince of Egypt, but as "son" of the pricess, it is highly to be doubted that any offspring of him would be Pharo.
The genealogy of Amenophis IV is quite well established (if we believe Egyptian Sources)
@eye-of-horus-42 removed their quoted posti am able to truthfully attest that the rabbi's postulations are incorrect
i am moses incarnated, reincarnated, and immortalized
have i got ten commandment stories to tell, HA!!!
i am not now, nor have i ever been, an egyptian king
i WAS once a microbrewer in the pharaoh's court, but that's another story
much more fun was when i was genghis khan AND confucius all at the same time, and that experience really blew my mind and helped form the excellent person you see before you today
perhaps