Originally posted by robbie carrobieboth as bad as each other he isn't in it for altruistic reasons Robbie power and greed drive that man and god help you if he becomes PM of Scotland.
Actually I am not a big Scottish nationalist but its the lesser of two evils. Faced with Salmond or the Tories you would vote for independence too.
Originally posted by huckleberryhoundIt's for sure the 1707 act of union has benefited Scotland, now doing over 10 billion pounds of trade with the US and Euro countries and there is the shipbuilding trade in Glasgow but not as great as in the past.
What you do is manage the resources better, and do what Norway did with their Oil revenue. That way, by the time the oil runs out the country will benefit from the money, rather than having it squandered away with nothing to show for it. Oil isn't our only resource, but you will know that already, right? You wouldn't start a thread like this without doing the research, that'd be a moronic thing to do.
I get the feeling Scotland can get along quite well without the UK now, what with your other trades, textiles, electronics, banking services and so forth, to say nothing of the thriving tourist trade.
Sounds like a good thing to split from the UK, at least from what I can see from across the pond.
Originally posted by redbadgerWell, I did notice on my trip to Ireland the most obnoxious riders on the trams were from Britain, noisy and rude like they were landlords or some such. I saw the Irish as very polite unless you get them drunk in front of a Brit🙂
it will be worth it to get rid of twats like you.
Originally posted by redbadgerSalmon done some good socialist things, he gave free medical prescriptions to everyone in Scotland and pensioners can ride on public transport anywhere in the entire country for free.
both as bad as each other he isn't in it for altruistic reasons Robbie power and greed drive that man and god help you if he becomes PM of Scotland.
Originally posted by sonhouseyou know that UK billions and American billions are different, right?
It's for sure the 1707 act of union has benefited Scotland, now doing over 10 billion pounds of trade with the US and Euro countries and there is the shipbuilding trade in Glasgow but not as great as in the past.
I get the feeling Scotland can get along quite well without the UK now, what with your other trades, textiles, electronics, banking services a ...[text shortened]... ounds like a good thing to split from the UK, at least from what I can see from across the pond.
http://eyeful-tower.com/muse/billion.htm
Originally posted by robbie carrobieScotland would be unlikely to be trading trillions of pounds OR dollars in US speak. I think the US version of billions is the right number of decimal points🙂
you know that UK billions and American billions are different, right?
http://eyeful-tower.com/muse/billion.htm
Originally posted by sonhouseYet if you look at our country under Westminster rule, you'd think we were one of the poorest nations in the world, not the 14th richest. Aye, it's time for a change.
It's for sure the 1707 act of union has benefited Scotland, now doing over 10 billion pounds of trade with the US and Euro countries and there is the shipbuilding trade in Glasgow but not as great as in the past.
I get the feeling Scotland can get along quite well without the UK now, what with your other trades, textiles, electronics, banking services a ...[text shortened]... ounds like a good thing to split from the UK, at least from what I can see from across the pond.
13 Sep 14
Originally posted by huckleberryhoundAnd England will prosper no more handouts to the scum called Scots I would repatriate all Scots residing in England .
Yet if you look at our country under Westminster rule, you'd think we were one of the poorest nations in the world, not the 14th richest. Aye, it's time for a change.
Originally posted by huckleberryhoundIsn't that ranking weighted by the oil revenues which are still not decided in terms of ownership between Westminster and Holyrood?
Yet if you look at our country under Westminster rule, you'd think we were one of the poorest nations in the world, not the 14th richest. Aye, it's time for a change.
Originally posted by divegeesterIf its in our territorial waters its ours and after independence you leeches are gonna have to pay up for it. We might even sell you our water if you behave. Have you produced a single credible reason why we should not be independent yet?
Isn't that ranking weighted by the oil revenues which are still not decided in terms of ownership between Westminster and Holyrood?
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI keep telling you I don't care and I wish you all the best. I think you'll find there is more to the oil situation than you are pretending.
If its in our territorial waters its ours and after independence you leeches are gonna have to pay up for it. We might even sell you our water if you behave. Have you produced a single credible reason why we should not be independent yet?
It's all moot; Scots will not vote for independence, even now it's very tight.
Originally posted by robbie carrobiewill it be king Alex the first or president Alex Robbie ?
If its in our territorial waters its ours and after independence you leeches are gonna have to pay up for it. We might even sell you our water if you behave. Have you produced a single credible reason why we should not be independent yet?
Originally posted by divegeesterCan you tell us why we should not be independent?
I keep telling you I don't care and I wish you all the best. I think you'll find there is more to the oil situation than you are pretending.
It's all moot; Scots will not vote for independence, even now it's very tight.