I love rotisserie chicken, pork, beef, and anything else good I can get in it.
Set it, and forget it!
Here is an “All Purpose Rub” I am not sure if it is the same rub I use, but it sounds close…..
This rub will work for almost any occasion at the barbecue grill. You can experiment with it. Some like it hot, others don't. If you like it mild, leave out the dry mustard or cayenne pepper.
¼ cup of firmly packed brown sugar
¼ cup of sweet paprika
3 tablespoons of black pepper
3 tablespoons kosher salt
1 tablespoon celery salt
1 tablespoon of celery seed
1 tablespoon of ground mustard
1 tablespoon of granulated garlic
1 tablespoon of onion powder
1 teaspoon of cayenne pepper
Mix all of the ingredients well. Store the rub in an airtight container such as a canning jar or a ziplock storage bag.
(Hope you like it Hot! Yum!)
P-
hmmmm thanks P
I will meditate on this recipe and say a prayer to the tree gods before i run out to the shed to fetch my rusty axe.
Why the rusty axe you ask??
It's just in case there are any tree hugging hippies preventing access to the chicken coup where my dinner is waiting for me, blissfully unaware that death is on its way. mwahhhhhh hahahaha
- Joined
- 20 Oct 02
- Moves
- 601366
Originally posted by Black Lung🙂 Recently they have been stocking my local grocery store with buffalo. It's delicious. Nice and lean, fries without a streak of fat in the pan. Hard to switch back to cow.
hahahahahahahahahahaha
Yes, that's right, i eat all kinds of animals. cows, sheep , chicken, wild stuff, turkey, fish. There's probably more but i can't remember them all right now.
haha
Originally posted by Black Lunglet me help you out a bit then. one estimate for the average animal consumption per person per lifetime is
Yes, that's right, i eat all kinds of animals. cows, sheep , chicken, wild stuff, turkey, fish. There's probably more but i can't remember them all right now.
20 pigs, 29 sheep, 5 cows, 780 chickens, 46 turkeys, 18 ducks and about 1,000 fish
the consequences of this on the animals are fairly obvious, but the consequences on people is something many people don't know about.
so i'm glad you brought it up 😉
in friendship,
prad
Originally posted by pradtfhow dramatic.......
the consequences on people is something many people don't know about.
please, tell me what dire consequences i will suffer later in life if i happen to eat dead animals?? nah, on second thought, i really don't feel like reading through another one of your tedious essays outlining your extremist point of view.
My way of life is natural, eating meat is natural, i have no prob if you eat veggies all day, that's natural too i suppose. It is unnatural, in my opinion, to spend your day worrying about animals that are bred to be burgers, it is unnatural to SPAM the forums with this PETA rubbish.
yours
preparaing an all purpose basting
lung
Originally posted by Black Lunghey, i am not a PETA advocate at all, or even a vegetarian. honestly, like you, i have trouble really emphathizing with all those factory farmed animals. i'd like to be able to, but i can't, i really can't, there are other things that are bigger to me.
...please, tell me what dire consequences i will suffer later in life if i happen to eat dead animals?? ... My way of life is natural, eating meat is natural ...It is unnatural, in my opinion, to spend your day worrying about animals that are bred to be burgers.
one of those things is pollution. for instance, run-off from pig farms in the carolinas is causing horrible ground water contamination, that is becoming a BIG problem.
another thing i think about is my own health. the chemicals, anti-biotics, and hormones they pump into these animals do not just disappear; we wind up ingesting them when we ingest their meat. i don't know about you, but i don't like ingesting chemicals that cause unnatural growth, restistant strains of bacteria, and cancer.
but i do feel like i need to eat meat on a somewhat regular basis, and so i find ways to get my meat without contributing to the pollution, or ingesting chemicals. i buy organic meat, which is usually also free range, and the cows are mostly grass fed. what this means is the meat is leaner, and chemical free, the animals are happier (if you care), and the environment is cleaner. sometimes the cost is even better. everybody wins, especially the small farmer who is now able to make a living without succumbing to mass agribusiness. that is very important to me.
if anyone wants to read a really great book on the subject, that has no intention of pushing a vegetarian diet, check out 'Fast Food Nation' by Eric Schlosser. a brilliant work. of course, wether or not it's moral to eat meat, is a personal decision, and every one has the right to decide for themselves. for those of us who do eat meat, we have to ask the additional question: "how does this impact me, and my environment,and what can i do about it?".
-mad cow
p.s. - the reason i dislike peta is for some of their questionable moves in the past: throwing paint on people withfur coats, taking credit for geting revlon to stop animal testing (thank you henry spira), firing their board of directors and giving themselves (the CEO pres, and 2 vps) huge raises. theyseem to have begun cleaning themselves up though...
1 edit
Originally posted by Black Lungi wasn't referring to any specific consequences you might suffer. i was just going to provide some information on consequences of animal based diets in general. it's really quite interesting if you can get over the tediousness of my posts, which i admit are often quite long.
how dramatic.......
please, tell me what dire consequences i will suffer later in life if i happen to eat dead animals?? nah, on second thought, i really don't feel like reading through another one of your tedious essays outlining y ...[text shortened]...
it is unnatural to SPAM the forums with this PETA rubbish.
as for spamming, i don't know why you say that. this is the general forum and while i have been posting frequently and 'tediously', i haven't violated any topic protocols.
however, if you feel i am spamming your particular thread, i will post in a separate one dealing with the consequences of animal based diets. you are welcome to read and write in it, should you wish to.
in friendship,
prad
1 edit
Originally posted by Mad Cowannice post, mad cowan.
p.s. firing their board of directors and giving themselves (the CEO pres, and 2 vps) huge raises. theyseem to have begun cleaning themselves up though...
i'm curious about your last statement since the public info about salaries is this:
"The majority of PETA's dedicated staff, 53 percent, earn only $15,000 to $26,000, 33 percent earn $26,001 to $36,999, and only the remaining 14 percent make more than $37,000. Our president, Ingrid Newkirk, earned $28,500 during fiscal year ending July 31, 2002."
do you know why they fired their board and to what extent and when? (i am not a peta person either - but i am finding out more and more about them, and i rather like what i know so far).
(sorry black lung for asking this here, but it seemed the appropriate place since the point was made here)
in friendship,
prad
Originally posted by Black LungI can recommend you a recently published book by Austin Duncan Brown "Feed or feedback. Agriculture. Population Dynamics and the state of the Planet".
how dramatic.......
please, tell me what dire consequences...
Austin Duncan Brown was Foundation Professor of Biology at the University of Wollongong. Worked also at the Universities of Manchester, Cambridge, California, Tübingen and a few other places all over the world.
On the back cover of his book you read:
FEED OR FEEDBACK is divided into three parts. The first deals with the birth and the subsequent evolution of agriculture, and its interaction with sanitation, public helth and population dynamics. Part two discusses present dimensions of human impact on the planet, an impact which could conceivably lead to human extinction. This capacity is a direct consequence of the size of the human population and its technological sophistication, neither of which would have been possible without agriculture. Part three outlines some basic responses needed to avoid the most serious components of that impact and some barriers in the way of those responses. The most fundamental of those barriers is to be found in aspects of human behaviour.
It may help you to understand why some people think, that it is important to discuss these matters.
Originally posted by pradtf20 pigs, 29 sheep, 5 cows, 780 chickens, 46 turkeys, 18 ducks and about 1,000 fish
let me help you out a bit then. one estimate for the average animal consumption per person per lifetime is
20 pigs, 29 sheep, 5 cows, 780 chickens, 46 turkeys, 18 ducks and about 1,000 fish
the consequences of this on the animals are fairly obvious, but the consequences on people is something many people don't know about.
so i'm glad you brought it up 😉
in friendship,
prad
i dont like fish or sheep or even turkeys or ducks so i guess i`m responsable for 40 pigs and 10 cows and 1000 chickens all though i prefer my chickens southern fried.mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm😛😕😀
Originally posted by Black LungPerhaps you do find his essays tedious. You are, of course, free to read them or not. One thing is quite clear: Prad's posts have been courteous and kind, yours is not.
how dramatic.......
nah, on second thought, i really don't feel like reading through another one of your tedious essays outlining your extremist point of view.
.....It is unnatural, in my opinion, to spend your day worrying about animals that are bred to be burgers, it is unnatural to SPAM the forums with this PETA rubbish.
yours
preparaing an all purpose basting
lung
Judging from the participation there are many who are interested in the topics he has posted to. Your reference to "SPAM"ing is inaccurate.
I wish you peace.