- Joined
- 10 Jan 08
- Moves
- 23315
Originally posted by Phlabibityou suck to
1600 rating is equivalent to being able to beat about 65 or so percent of anyone you sit against.
This is an insult to people rated like I am. I don't suck, I just could do a LOT better.
Alerted!
P-
in fact all of that 65% can suck my bishop after i wax them.
why do they even bother playing if they can't beat me?
why do i play when i'm so crap?
Originally posted by trev33shut yer piehole!
i present the still in progress (so shut your trap) exhibit A
Game 5829649
still think i'm any good?
😞
You're ahead, what more do you want?
An Oscar?
Originally posted by trev33padgerpadgerpadger...
i present the still in progress (so shut your trap) exhibit A
Game 5829649
still think i'm any good?
😞
3 edits
Originally posted by Phlabibit1600 players still play so primmitive that the games are ugly to watch. 1700 - 2000 are even worse. U have to work and learn like mad for that rating and ur games are STILL primmitive and ugly looking 🙁
1600 rating is equivalent to being able to beat about 65 or so percent of anyone you sit against.
This is an insult to people rated like I am. I don't suck, I just could do a LOT better.
Alerted!
P-
I like 1200 or less rated players more, they can play hillariously random but sometimes also they can surprise you with very good play and they are having fun with this game.
1600-2000 are stuck in their mediocre, boring, pathetic, never ending attempt to play decent and they post in only chess forum asking stupid questions, change their learning books and ideas every day, follow grandmaster opening books they really don't understand. Result ; miserable games
MWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Chess sucks.
I am gonna go to play go.
Originally posted by ivan2908I had the most fun in the beginning, where I wasn't afraid to try wild ideas and I knew that most blunders would be recoverable.
I like 1200 or less rated players more, they can play hillariously random but sometimes also they can surprise you with very good play and they are having fun with this game.
Since I don't study chess, I just learned how to minimize blunders by self-control, raised my rating to near 1700 and lost almost all pleasure in chess. 😞
The strange thing is that now that I see the craziness in most of those ideas and I cannot go back! It would feel like I'm throwing the game...
- Joined
- 10 Jan 08
- Moves
- 23315
Originally posted by Palynkathis is the way i was feeling, been playing for about 3 years and the fun is completely sucked out of it when you play boring chess with less blunders.
I had the most fun in the beginning, where I wasn't afraid to try wild ideas and I knew that most blunders would be recoverable.
Since I don't study chess, I just learned how to minimize blunders by self-control, raised my rating to near 1700 and lost almost all pleasure in chess. 😞
The strange thing is that now that I see the craziness in most of those ideas and I cannot go back! It would feel like I'm throwing the game...
that's why i've played the 2009 champs as a blitz tournament, i still think a little about what i'm doing but don't double check anything and it's resulted it some crazy games. it's only a matter of time before i lose to a 1200 or something but i don't care.