Go back
Illegal move

Illegal move

General

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by HandyAndy
Who's Noddles?
User 80946

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Phlabibit
I'll ask nooodles and get back to you.
You should have learned about the subjunctive mood in the sixth grade. Or were you absent that day?

Who's nooodles?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by HandyAndy
You should have learned about the subjunctive mood in the sixth grade. Or were you absent that day?

Who's nooodles?
User 292993

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ChessPraxis
User 80946
Before she learned to spell?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ChessPraxis
User 292993
Closer, but not there yet.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by HandyAndy
Closer, but not there yet.
User 195998

Vote Up
Vote Down

User 416568

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by HandyAndy
Who's Noddles?
n00b

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Phlabibit
n00b
User 292996

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by HandyAndy
User 416568
http://tinyurl.com/NewDells

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Phlabibit
No.. That second comma makes 'grammatical errors' a statement on its own, and makes so little sense that you almost blew up the time space continuum through your ignorance of grammar.
Okay. They're my commas and you're not playing with them. Never understood the stoopied things anyway 😠

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Sicilian Sausage
Okay. They're my commas and you're not playing with them. Never understood the stoopied things anyway 😠
It's like, you pause a bit, when you read stuff. 😕

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ChessPraxis
It's like, you pause a bit, when you read stuff. 😕
Yes, but everyone talks differently and pauses at different points of a sentence. Apparently though, there are correct places to put them in a sentence. So who is right and who is wrong? Also, there is an implied pause before the word 'and' and 'or', so a comma is not needed. Would this implied pause also precede 'but' and 'so' and if not, why not?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Sicilian Sausage
Yes, but everyone talks differently and pauses at different points of a sentence. Apparently though, there are correct places to put them in a sentence. So who is right and who is wrong? Also, there is an implied pause before the word 'and' and 'or', so a comma is not needed. Would this implied pause also precede 'but' and 'so' and if not, why not?
When I studied English I was taught that in English a comma can be placed wherever you wish to make a pause. In Swedish however there are more strict rules when to use comma.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Trev33
In this context it should've been 'plastic and silicone'.

That waterfall has a lot of waters.

That waterfall has a lot of water.

Pick the correct sentence... basically what we're working with here.
No, there may be several types of silicone involved (particularly if you're discussing either more than one woman), so silicones is also correct.

I did not precede the word with "a lot of", so that quibble is irrelevant. A more closely similar sentence involving water would be "The greatest source of plastic polution these days is yuppies drinking bottled waters."; they may be drinking several bottled waters (Pellegrino, Dasani and Naive), collectively as well as individually.

Richard