http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/8289313.stm
Geez, what's wrong with these guys deciding to have wrestlemania at 40,000 feet in a plane full of human passengers. Its a good thing they are noobs and cannot knock out each other with only one punch. Now passengers need not worry about terrorists on air but on the crew turning on each other !
Originally posted by trev33That statistic is misleading, that 'true' statistic is biased in favour of the likelihood of crashing per the number of miles travelled. When travelling by air you travel a much larger number of miles than you do to the airport, and as such when you look at the statistic per journey, plane crashes are much more likely than car crashes.
statistically [b]specking you're more likely to be killed on the way to the airport than you are while flying.[/b]
Indeed, statistically speaking, you are guaranteed to die horribly.
Originally posted by Bad wolfhow many commercial planes crashed in the past year? in that time how many people died on the roads? hhmmm
That statistic is misleading, that 'true' statistic is biased in favour of the likelihood of crashing per the number of miles travelled. When travelling by air you travel a much larger number of miles than you do to the airport, and as such when you look at the statistic per journey, plane crashes are much more likely than car crashes.
Indeed, statistically speaking, you are guaranteed to die horribly.
Originally posted by trev33Airplanes carry a lot more people than cars, so more possible deaths in the event of a crash, there is also proportionally far fewer airplanes in the sky, than there are cars on the road. Both these would scew the statistics, all it takes is for an airplane to crash every few years to make it more dangerous than cars on a per journey basis.
how many commercial planes crashed in the past year? in that time how many people died on the roads? hhmmm
Originally posted by Bad wolfso we agree it's more dangerous on the road than in a plane. excellent.
Airplanes carry a lot more people than cars, so more possible deaths in the event of a crash, there is also proportionally far fewer airplanes in the sky, than there are cars on the road. Both these would scew the statistics, all it takes is for an airplane to crash every few years to make it more dangerous than cars on a per journey basis.
Originally posted by trev33Hardly, my point was that with fewer planes, despite less fatal crashes in absolute terms, those that do crash are a higher proportion of the total of airplanes in the sky, than say a single car crashing as a proportion of the total number of cars; making airplanes more dangerous.
so we agree it's more dangerous on the road than in a plane. excellent.
Originally posted by Bad wolffinish this sentence for me. more people die on the roads of this earth than die in the air therefore......
Hardly, my point was that with fewer planes, despite less fatal crashes in absolute terms, those that do crash are a higher proportion of the total of airplanes in the sky, than say a single car crashing as a proportion of the total number of cars; making airplanes more dangerous.
a. it is statistically specking more dangerous on the roads than it is in the air.
b. it is statistically specking more dangerous on the roads than it is in the air.
c. it is statistically specking more dangerous on the roads than it is in the air.
Originally posted by trev33d) It is statistically specking relatively more dangerous in the air than on the road.
finish this sentence for me. more people die on the roads of this earth than die in the air therefore......
a. it is statistically specking more dangerous on the roads than it is in the air.
b. it is statistically specking more dangerous on the roads than it is in the air.
c. it is statistically specking more dangerous on the roads than it is in the air.