18 Mar 08
3 edits
Originally posted by uzlessYour well intentioned construct seems somewhat superficial and quite
What category do most of your conversations fall into?
Simple minds discuss people.
Average minds discuss events.
Superior minds discuss ideas.
simplistic. Let's be clear... the WEAK always find frontal and/or subtle
ways to criticize the strong, while the STRONG always constructively deal
with worthwhile issues. Bottom line, it's all about character not IQ.
-gb
🙂
18 Mar 08
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyYou're making the same mistake then.
Your well intentioned construct seems somewhat superficial and quite
simplistic. Let's be clear... the WEAK always find frontal and/or subtle
ways to criticize the strong, while the STRONG always constructively deal with worthwhile issues. Bottom line, it's about character not IQ.
-gb
🙂
18 Mar 08
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyStrong people don't have moments of weakness?
Your well intentioned construct seems somewhat superficial and quite
simplistic. Let's be clear... the WEAK always find frontal and/or subtle
ways to criticize the strong, while the STRONG always constructively deal
with worthwhile issues. Bottom line, it's all about character not IQ.
-gb
🙂
Weak people don't have moments of strength?
18 Mar 08
1 edit
Originally posted by PalynkaPlease look again. My unemotional post focuses on the construct, not in any way
You're criticizing those that you proclaim to be WEAK without "constructively dealing with worthwhile issues".
on the personality or person of 'uzless'. That was your conclusion. -gb
18 Mar 08
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyRegarding your comment I'm not focusing on the person of 'uzless'. That was your conclusion.
Please look again. My unemotional post focuses on the construct, not in any way
on with the personality or person of 'uzless'. That was your conclusion. -gb
Nevertheless, my point stands regarding any so such labeling between "WEAK" and "STRONG" people.