Originally posted by robbie carrobieredbadger admitted that'd he'd engaged in 'gay bashing'. And you say "I don't know anything about what Redbadger has allegedly done"
I don't know anything about what Redbadger has allegedly done and neither do you
If a fellow JW admitted to you that he'd raped children, would your stance be that you knew nothing about what that fellow JW had done to children?
1 edit
Originally posted by FMFI seek to understand rather than condemn, i don't know anything about what red badger has allegedly done and i certainly don't know anything about your hypothetical mock up. I find the incessant regurgitation of the same questions tedious if I am honest. I have explained my position more than adequately for anyone to understand it, it is enough for me.
redbadger admitted that'd he'd engaged in 'gay bashing'. And you say "I don't know anything about what Redbadger has allegedly done"
If a fellow JW admitted to you that he'd raped children, would your stance be that you knew nothing about what that fellow JW had done to children?
1 edit
Originally posted by Ghost of a Dukehehe lucky you I gotta drive to Edinburgh to a children's hospital, I don't like Edinburgh and I don't like hospitals 🙁
Ah, a beautiful Sunday morning; no work to go to, pub lunch to look forward to, two Christians squabbling about cheese.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieSo if a fellow JW admitted to you that he'd had sex with children, for all intents and purposes his secret would be safe with you because your stance would be that you "know absolutely nothing about" it?
i certainly don't know anything about your hypothetical mock up.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieBut surely, your "position" as laid out on this thread and on the thread at SF is a completely sarcastic one that is not, in fact, your genuine stance, right?
I have explained my position more than adequately for anyone to understand it, it is enough for me.
1 edit
Originally posted by robbie carrobieOK, so you don't care about any homosexuals that redbadger has told us he assaulted. And you would not condemn a fellow JW if he told you he had mollested or raped other people's children. I think I see where you are coming from. So, let's ask you this: If your fellow JW revealed to you that he'd molested your children, would you seek to understand rather than condemn?
I seek to understand rather than condemn...
Originally posted by FMFAnother silly and transparent ad hominem and logical fallacy, I have not stated that I do not care and I resent your slanderous attempts say that I have. You might believe your own propaganda but you cannot expect any other logical and sentient being to also accept it, seriously, its just drool.
OK, so you don't care about any homosexuals that redbadger has told us he assaulted. And you would not condemn a fellow JW if he told you he had mollested or raped other people's children. I think I see where you are coming from. So, let's ask you this: If your fellow JW revealed to you that he'd molested your children, would you seek to understand rather than condemn?
1 edit
Originally posted by FMFIf that's what you want to believe dude that's up to you, personally I don't believe anything you say and I don't know anyone that does. Its just drool, copious amounts of slobbery drool.
But surely, your "position" as laid out on this thread and on the thread at SF is a completely sarcastic one that is not, in fact, your genuine stance, right?