Go back
Is Sonhouse A Liar

Is Sonhouse A Liar

General

1 edit

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Rusty was on holiday,
lots of chips and sand,
his break was completely voluntary,
in no way was he banned.
Very good goad, that was much more polite even if it was incorrect! πŸ˜‰

You seem to have a problem getting your FACTS straight! πŸ˜›

-VR


@ghost-of-a-duke said
Rusty was on holiday,
lots of chips and sand,
his break was completely voluntary,
in no way was he banned.
rustbucket's a dang canadian,
that's why he's so bland...
if only he was texian,
he'd never git hizzelf banned...

1 edit

@wolfe63 said
Go whine to the Mods.
Act like the thin-skinned hypocrit that you've always been.

I've witnessed you dishing out gallons of personal abuse in these threads. Yet, you're too squeamish to swallow a teaspoonful of your own bilious tincture.

Please Lord, give us a break from the idiocy. There's enough of it flitting about the planet already.
He asks for an apology even though, for my first 3 years on this site, he referred to me regularly as non-sub scum. (Even after telling him I found the expression offensive).

Comedy gold.


@rookie54 said
rustbucket's a dang canadian,
that's why he's so bland...
if only he was texian,
he'd never git hizzelf banned...
Rookie's such a funny chap
with a poetic quip, he's always lurking,
If I had to compare him to a condiment
I'd probably choose the gherkin.


@ghost-of-a-duke said
He asks for an apology even though, for my first 3 years on this site, he referred to me regularly as non-sub scum. (Even after telling him I found the expression offensive).

Comedy gold.
No Goad, the funny part is you never paid attention to my reply: we called everyone who wasn't a paying subscriber a non-sub-scum. It obviously worked on you as you got a paid Subscription now. πŸ˜›

-VR

1 edit

@rookie54 said
rustbucket's a dang canadian,
that's why he's so bland...
if only he was texian,
he'd never git hizzelf banned...
And you are an American who probably voted for the Trumpster!!!! πŸ˜›

How do you feel about that now, in fact how do feel about how the Trumpster has managed to distance himself from his allies?

-VR


@very-rusty said
No Goad, the funny part is you never paid attention to my reply: we called everyone who wasn't a paying subscriber a non-sub-scum. It obviously worked on you as you got a paid Subscription now. πŸ˜›

-VR
Ah that's okay then, if you call 'every' non-paying subscriber non-sub-scum.

I'm sure that's exactly what Russ wants as a welcoming introduction to the site.

1 edit

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Ah that's okay then, if you call 'every' non-paying subscriber non-sub-scum.

I'm sure that's exactly what Russ wants as a welcoming introduction to the site.
You were the last one I called a non-sub-scum at least for now!!!

You had a lot to say for a non-subscriber! I imagine if it works Russ is ok with it!!!
πŸ˜‰

You couldn't even flag the post as you were not a subsciber! πŸ˜‰ πŸ˜›

-VR


@very-rusty said
You were the last one I called a non-sub-scum at least for now!!!

You had a lot to say for a non-subscriber! I imagine if it works Russ is ok with it!!!
πŸ˜‰

You couldn't even flag the post as you were not a subsciber! πŸ˜‰ πŸ˜›

-VR
Don't you have any hobbies?
I don't know, maybe like collecting; comic books, Canadian coins or Post Toasties box-tops?

You'd be great at any of those.

1 edit

@wolfe63 said
Don't you have any hobbies?
I don't know, maybe like collecting; comic books, Canadian coins or Post Toasties box-tops?

You'd be great at any of those.
Slilly wolfe63...Why would I want to do the same hobbies as you?

I guess chess would be the only one we have in common! πŸ˜›

-VR

1 edit

@very-rusty said
You were the last one I called a non-sub-scum at least for now!!!

You had a lot to say for a non-subscriber! I imagine if it works Russ is ok with it!!!
πŸ˜‰

You couldn't even flag the post as you were not a subsciber! πŸ˜‰ πŸ˜›

-VR
Let's be quite clear sir:

1. You referring to me and other non-subscribers as 'scum' did not incentivize me to subscribe, and actually delayed my subscription (not wanting you to think I had paid to stop your abuse).

2. I do not believe Russ is 'okay' with you calling non-subscribers 'scum' as a fruitful way to increase subscription. I think it is something that has fallen beneath his radar as non-subscribers are indeed less likely to follow your lead and report posts.

3. non-subscribers are not 'scum' and people choose not to subscribe here for a number of valid reasons. Initially, when I came here I was only looking to play a handful of games and chat in the forums, something entirely possible and permitted without being a subscriber. My recent decision to become a subscriber was purely to take part in the clan system. Nothing to do with you.

4. And you are right, non-subs can not directly flag abuse. How cowardly of you to exploit and revel in that fact.


Well said Ghosty.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@very-rusty said
Slilly wolfe63...Why would I want to do the same hobbies as you?

I guess chess would be the only one we have in common! πŸ˜›

-VR
You both should have a good game together, your ratings are very close. Have you in fact played him yet?

1 edit

1 edit

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Let's be quite clear sir:

1. You referring to me and other non-subscribers as 'scum' did not incentivize me to subscribe, and actually delayed my subscription (not wanting you to think I had paid to stop your abuse).

2. I do not believe Russ is 'okay' with you calling non-subscribers 'scum' as a fruitful way to increase subscription. I think it is something tha ...[text shortened]... right, non-subs can not directly flag abuse. How cowardly of you to exploit and revel in that fact.
LOL....I think I got under you so called thick skin there goad.

Think about this anyone could have flagged the posts and they didn't.

I wonder why that was?

You aren't here to play chess just get in the prose competition and stir the pot with those you don't care for or have a different opinion than. Makes you no less guilty of being abusive and perhaps a bit of a bully!!!

-VR