Well its got mountains and valleys, so can't be flat.
Those mountains and valleys mean it can't be a sphere.
(That's "round" to those with a 2D bent to describing 3D objects).
So answer: neither.
And PS, if that aint bad enough, try defining the geometric coordinate system before we describe a shape:
cartesian co-ords are not the only choice we have available...
In fact, using an "earth" co-ordinate system, I can now clearly define the shape of the earth as a point.
Which is of course pointless. 😉
Originally posted by SonicDeathMonk3yHaHaHa. I have to say, I found the Flat earth Society website very entertaining. It's the "Naked Gun" presentation of "science" that I enjoyed.
Fools! All of you are pawns to the web of lies formulated by those who want you to believe the earth is round! The truth can be found here:
http://www.flat-earth.org/
Originally posted by CribsThis is ridiculous. Even were the Earth to be flat, it is still huge. Where on Earth, no pun intended, could a person be standing to see all four corners. And how does an angel "hold" wind?
Flat. In particular, a four-sided polygon.
Biblical proof is always the best.
Revelation 7:1
And after these things I saw four angels standing on the [b]four corners of the earth, holding the four winds of the earth, that the wind should not blow on the earth, nor on the sea, nor on any tree. [/b]
~ Cheshire Cat 😀
Originally posted by Cribs"....their habitation" not their inhabitants. Big difference.
Oh, not only did we land there, but we also know that
people live there. And not only there, but on the sun!
Hab. 3:11
The sun and moon stood still in their [b]habitation: at the light of thine arrows they went, and at the shining of thy glittering spear.[/b]
~ Cheshire Cat 😀
Originally posted by NathanMarchActually, the earth has been measured around the equator and around the pole caps. There is a large difference between the measurements. So one can presume that there is at least a curve.
Please give me the most clever answer that you can, and the best will recieve and prize of...
The stars seen on the southern hemisphere are different to the stars seen on the north. This also entails different angels, although the cube form of Cribby G could also fit into this one (but not in the previous).
If you measure the distance between Glasgow and London and the angles between them, with the third point being the moon, you can form a triangle. You can then work out the length of distance between Glasgow and the moon at any given point and London and the moon at any given point, and taking the same point, the distances will be different.
If you do this from Sydney and from Reikovic, the difference will be significantly different and you will then see the curve of the earth for sure.
Or somethin' like that. Sometimes I feel like Tim "The toolman" Taylor, after he's been talking to Wilson.
And at least you can't accuse me of copy and pastin'....