Originally posted by arrakisGood for you... I'm of like mind, myself...
I'm one of those people who don't respect judges, ministers, child molesters and/or Republicans. 😉
Edit: If the judge had been a woman... Well, it would never have happened. Women don't let their sex drive control their lives.
And yes, your second sentence is what I *meant* to say. 🙂
Originally posted by kirksey957Well, no, that's not what I meant. I meant that if the judge were a woman, she certainly would not be sitting behind her bench diddling herself while court was in session.
Are you saying that there are no women judges in this country? Nigga, please.
Sorry if I was unclear.
Originally posted by cashthetrashWell, no, I don't believe it is an actual criminal offense, but it should be, and that was my point. Anyone in any "position of power" has a responsibility to the public to conduct themselves in a manner representing their office. Which is also why I think it should be a crime that the current President is such an idiot, and the previous President was such a horn dog.
I agree with you that yes it is criminal offence, but is "Betraying the public trust" actually a criminal offence? I have never heard that. That sounds more like a lynching offence rather than a criminal one.
Originally posted by SuzianneWhy not? There are women who rape children, there are women who like to watch others rape children, etc. Of course most judges, male or female, wouldn't masturbate behind their bench while court was in session, but I can't see how being female completely excludes the possibility.
I meant that if the judge were a woman, she certainly would not be sitting behind her bench diddling herself while court was in session.
Originally posted by NordlysLet's just say that it reduces the possibility down to the point of virtual non-existence.
Why not? There are women who rape children, there are women who like to watch others rape children, etc. Of course most judges, male or female, wouldn't masturbate behind their bench while court was in session, but I can't see how being female completely excludes the possibility.
Seems odd that such a highly immoral and irrational person in our society attains the position to judge others.
Kinda like the priest who gets his kicks by molesting little girls behind their parent's back. Or the president of the U.S. who has sworn to protect the constitution, but does everything he can to destroy it.
Has anyone besides myself noticed that most people who commit such horrendous crimes against society are people who propose to be "God fearing Christians"?
I bring the question up not to attack Christians. I myself am a believer in God, but I do not let my beliefs blind me of crooked judges, molesting ministers and corrupt politicians.
Originally posted by arrakisI sadly agree with you. I don't think that the problem is so much with Christianity but with those who use the name of Christianity to obtain social power and then misrepresent it to mean something evil and anti 'Prince of Peace" as apposed to something good.
Seems odd that such a highly immoral and irrational person in our society attains the position to judge others.
Kinda like the priest who gets his kicks by molesting little girls behind their parent's back. Or the president of the U.S. who has sworn to protect the constitution, but does everything he can to destroy it.
Has anyone besides myself noticed ...[text shortened]... o not let my beliefs blind me of crooked judges, molesting ministers and corrupt politicians.
