13 Oct 05
Oh.
The question that should be on everyone's mind is obviously: What constitues as a spam-thread?
Right, we're talking about posts which:
- Have no aesthetic value
- Have no artistic value
- Do not have a point, other than self-recognition (like this one)
- Ask for top 10's without argumentation, reasoning or explanation
- Promote a commercial aim
Seriously, if you can't be arsed thinking up something amusing...don't bother at all.
13 Oct 05
2 edits
Originally posted by shavixmir-Have no aesthetic value ~ Liike most of your deliberate long winded ramblings.
Oh.
The question that should be on everyone's mind is obviously: What constitues as a spam-thread?
Right, we're talking about posts which:
- Have no aesthetic value
- Have no artistic value
- Do not have a point, other than self-recognition (like this one)
- Ask for top 10's without argumentation, reasoning or explanation
- Promote a comm ...[text shortened]... l aim
Seriously, if you can't be arsed thinking up something amusing...don't bother at all.
-Have no artistic value ~ Not dissimilar to your opinionated, narrow minded BS
-Do not have a point other than self-recognition ~ Jesus! Have you ever read any of your posts.
The last two I cannot fault you on.
I have never read anything about these points in the TOS. Nor do I think it is general consensus here. Perhaps these are your rules? Perhaps others disagree.
14 Oct 05
Originally posted by shavixmirMust the feeble minded be forever mute?
Oh.
The question that should be on everyone's mind is obviously: What constitues as a spam-thread?
Right, we're talking about posts which:
- Have no aesthetic value
- Have no artistic value
- Do not have a point, other than self-recognition (like this one)
- Ask for top 10's without argumentation, reasoning or explanation
- Promote a comm ...[text shortened]... l aim
Seriously, if you can't be arsed thinking up something amusing...don't bother at all.
I still agree with your post though, but I got the urge now to know your answer to jimslyp69 question..
What was your favourite colour on Tuesday? Oh please tell us!
14 Oct 05
Originally posted by jimslyp69It's amazing how one of your posts (the first) can be so spammy (and unfunny), yet the following so sarcastic and enjoyable.
-Have no aesthetic value ~ Liike most of your deliberate long winded ramblings.
-Have no artistic value ~ Not dissimilar to your opinionated, narrow minded BS
-Do not have a point other than self-recognition ~ Jesus! Have you ever read any of your posts.
The last two I cannot fault you on.
I have never read anything about these points in the TOS. N ...[text shortened]... do I think it is general consensus here. Perhaps these are your rules? Perhaps others disagree.
If everyone followed your example, they'd get to understand exactly what I'm on about.
14 Oct 05
Originally posted by shavixmirQuit spamming dude before I poke my finger with your eye. 😛
It's amazing how one of your posts (the first) can be so spammy (and unfunny), yet the following so sarcastic and enjoyable.
If everyone followed your example, they'd get to understand exactly what I'm on about.
G'night, work in the morning. 😴
14 Oct 05
1 edit
Originally posted by shavixmirjimslyp69's got your number doesn't he. 'Spamming Rec Whore' has a ring to it as your official title, I love it.
It's amazing how one of your posts (the first) can be so spammy (and unfunny), yet the following so sarcastic and enjoyable.
If everyone followed your example, they'd get to understand exactly what I'm on about.
Edit: Loser.