Go back
Light is amazing ~ some factoids

Light is amazing ~ some factoids

General


1 edit

@moonbus said
No. And it would not matter if the void were full of light and you did or did not turn on your headlights. You would not see it. Nothing, no photon or other form of information, from the car 100 feet away could catch up to you and impact on your sense organs. Neither could you receive a radio message transmitted from the other car.

There is an elementary Denkfehler in thin ...[text shortened]... at c cannot send and receive back a reflection from the other vehicle travelling at the same speed.
Are you helping Educate the Gooster? πŸ™‚

-VR

1 edit

@very-rusty said
Are you helping Educate the Gooster? πŸ™‚

-VR
For anyone who cares to listen:

Einstein's fundamental insight is this: the speed of light does not accumulate, unlike the speed of a bullet. For example, if a bullet exits the muzzle of a gun at 200 mph, and the gun is pointing forwards on a freight train moving at 100 mph, then the total speed of the bullet is 300 mph (minus some air friction, of course). Whereas, if you shine a torch off the front end of a freight train moving at 100 mph, the speed of the light beam is not 100 mph plus c. It is c. Just c. The speed of the freight train does not influence the speed of light. Therefore, if the train is moving at the speed of light already, a light beam shone off the front end of the train will not exceed the speed of the train itself, it'll be 'stuck', as it were, on (or in) the light source itself.


@moonbus said
For anyone who cares to listen:

Einstein's fundamental insight is this: the speed of light does not accumulate, unlike the speed of a bullet. For example, if a bullet exits the muzzle of a gun at 200 mph, and the gun is pointing forwards on a freight train moving at 100 mph, then the total speed of the bullet is 300 mph (minus some air friction, of course). Whereas, if you ...[text shortened]... eed the speed of the train itself, it'll be 'stuck', as it were, on (or in) the light source itself.
I can't remember the last time I was so uninterested in a post.... πŸ˜› πŸ™‚

-VR


@moonbus said
For anyone who cares to listen:

Einstein's fundamental insight is this: the speed of light does not accumulate, unlike the speed of a bullet. For example, if a bullet exits the muzzle of a gun at 200 mph, and the gun is pointing forwards on a freight train moving at 100 mph, then the total speed of the bullet is 300 mph (minus some air friction, of course). Whereas, if you ...[text shortened]... eed the speed of the train itself, it'll be 'stuck', as it were, on (or in) the light source itself.
BUT WHAT HAPPENS IF YOU DO IT IN TOTAL DARKNES WITH A SOLAR POWERED TORCH.


@david-burton said
BUT WHAT HAPPENS IF YOU DO IT IN TOTAL DARKNES WITH A SOLAR POWERED TORCH.
Now it is getting interesting. πŸ™‚

-VR



-Removed-
I am going to have to strongly disagree with you of course. πŸ™‚

-VR


3 edits

@David-Burton

True, Hate to see a grown boy cry. πŸ™‚

Appears he alerted your post, he who never alerts posts. πŸ™‚

I didn't add you quote so even if it gets removed this should stay. πŸ™‚

-VR


2 edits


2 edits

The post that was quoted here has been removed
Yea, I know it irks him if I disagree with him so I make it a point to do so. I wouldn't want to ruin his day by not disagreeing with him. πŸ™‚

He lives to argue, just love it! πŸ™‚ Just look in the Spirituality Forum. πŸ™‚

-VR

2 edits

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.