Originally posted by FMF
I could give you links to arguments on either side of the long standing debate about this issue in the U.S. and tell you which side of the debate I see myself on, but I'm not even going to do that. 😉
I find the assertion "it's about ethnicity and/or fear" somewhat specious and also naïve.
For my perspective (which is informed with multiple dealings with the courts on both personal and professional fronts over the last three decades), the conversation begins and ends with the
purpose of the court.
The assumption that puts the court in the position of administer of justice is the naïve position.
In nearly all situations, the court is not concerned with justice, even as a byproduct.
This is a money generating proposition from the lowest to the highest court, and without exception.
Even at the Supreme Court level where the decisions typically smell miles removed from direct contact with the hoi pollio, the theatre serves to offer legitimacy to both itself and the money makers, the lower courts.
Black, in the mind of the court (as well as all other ethnicities and skin colors with equally impoverished members), merely appears as
opportunity.
Those in robes thumb their nose at the rows and rows of below-average-joes.
They pick on folks who can't fight back.