@eladarsaid Perhaps because at heart you are a bozo as well?
Or is it that you do not understand why when having a discussion a person would not actually answer a person's question?
You don't seem to want to discuss why the Klinger storyline would not be included in a sitcom in 2020 while it was included in the 1970s. You don't seem the slightest bit interested. You've blanked out every attempt to engage you on the topic.
@eladarsaid Once a person has been given a chance to answer a question, but the person side steps the question to argue something else, the person is a bozo.
What would be your reason to make a show with the Klinger plotline in it in 2020? What point would you see yourself as making?
@eladarsaid If the person is not a bozo, the person will simply not respond to the question at all.
Given contemporary norms and attitudes, what commercial model of TV production and advertising revenue would "allow" you to place your 2020 attitudes [to what Corporal Klinger and the U.S. Army did and thought in the 1970s] at the heart of a TV sitcom and have it be viable?
@eladarsaid I even ask for a yes or no but do not get a response.
You did get several thoughtful responses that directly invited you to discuss the topic. But you are simply dodging any discussion of why the Klinger subplot wouldn't work in 2020 and why no one would incorporate it into a contemporary sitcom. Over and over again you have chosen not to engage in the discussion.
@wolfe63said If it wasn't for the laugh-track, "Dad's Army" would have been tedious viewing. At least canned laughter can cue the attempted punch-line.
Dad’s Army is 1970s British humour made by British people for the British people, it’s ok if people from other countries don’t get it.
I’ve never seen any 1970s Russian sitcoms. I’m pretty sure I wouldn’t get those.
@fmfsaid Klinger was portrayed as completely sane. You don't seem to understand the kind of satire M*A*S*H purveyed, despite claiming that you watched it.
Why are you dodging all the questions and attempts to discuss the discuss why the plotline would no longer work?
Yes, Klinger was portrayed as a heterosexual male who is pretending to be a cross dresser as a way to get out of the Army.
Klinger was a normal male, looking to get classified as having a mental disorder by dressing as if he were a cross dresser.