Originally posted by Bad wolfim not getting any as well. but i do not rant at girls who are
It has come to my attention that the majority of the male population are man whores, only wanting to get into relationships in order to get sex, going out to seedy bars and clubs, only to get laid.
There seems to be notion of being a 'stud' for acting in such a manner, I prefer to think of them as being 'womanising jerks' myself though, worthy only of my ...[text shortened]... hey have thoughts and feelings too, and I think we should all respect that.
**Rant over**
Originally posted by shavixmirNot necessarily, that definition is so unnecessarily strict, for someone who sleeps around as far as I can be concerned, is a whore, I don't see why that word can't apply. However, to expand on the notion of someone being payed 'money' for sex, you could say that instead of money, it could be being bought a few drinks, or such.
A whore is someone who earns money for sex.
Moron.
Originally posted by Bad wolfcalling someone who has a lot of sex a whore, is like calling a surgeon a serial murderer.
Not necessarily, that definition is so unnecessarily strict, for someone who sleeps around as far as I can be concerned, is a whore, I don't see why that word can't apply. However, to expand on the notion of someone being payed 'money' for sex, you could say that instead of money, it could be being bought a few drinks, or such.
Originally posted by wormwoodThat analogy breaks down because a sugeon's goal is not to kill the patient, but to save them. I can hardly imagine a whore's goal being not to have sex with people they're having sex with.
calling someone who has a lot of sex a whore, is like calling a surgeon a serial murderer.
2 edits
Originally posted by Bad wolfa whore doesn't have sex because he/she wants to have sex, he/she does it for money.
That analogy breaks down because a sugeon's goal is not to kill the patient, but to save them. I can hardly imagine a whore's goal being not to have sex with people they're having sex with.
there's nothing wrong with having a lot of sex. in fact, it's good for you, both mentally AND physically. as is being in touch with your sexuality, and seeing it as the normal healthy thing it is.
it is, however, not healthy to see sex as something dirty, disgusting, shameful or morally questionable thing. to loathe people who have a lot of sex, just because they have a lot of sex. it basically means that you hate a part of yourself, and have some issues you should work out.
you don't have to have a lot of sex if you don't want to. in fact it would be a twisted thing to do in that case. but it shouldn't affect you emotionally if others do. and believe me, they do. it's one of the strongest natural drives we have in us. it shouldn't make you angry that other people are doing things which make them happy with each other.
Originally posted by wormwoodI'de rec that post if you wern't such a forum bullyðŸ˜
a whore doesn't have sex because he/she wants to have sex, he/she does it for money.
there's nothing wrong with having a lot of sex. in fact, it's good for you, both mentally AND physically. as is being in touch with your sexuality, and seeing it as the normal healthy thing it is.
it is, however, not healthy to see sex as something dirty, disgusting, make you angry that other people are doing things which make them happy with each other.
edit: oh who am I kidding, I'll rec it anyway😳
Originally posted by wormwoodFor the completion of the goal of making money, you cannot deny that these people must also make the aim of having sex with these people, regardless of whether they really want to do such things or not, they have to make this aim, for otherwise, they wouldn't be going out to these so called 'red light districts' or where ever else they find themselves, in order to prostitute themselves.
a whore doesn't have sex because he/she wants to have sex, he/she does it for money.
there's nothing wrong with having a lot of sex. in fact, it's good for you, both mentally AND physically. as is being in touch with your sexuality, and seeing it as the normal healthy thing it is.
it is, however, not healthy to see sex as something dirty, disgusting, make you angry that other people are doing things which make them happy with each other.
To expand the argument on the very separate notions you discuss beyond this, I thank you for mentioning that those people who do not want lots of sex need not have it, for this is my position, it is also my position however, that from what is highlighted in bold, to further the argument, that people may also not have any sex if they do not want as well.
For this relates back to the notion that sex is good for you emotionally and physically, anyone not indulging in such behaviour would not necessarily be suffering emotionally and physically, because of the mere reason they do not want it, it well be that such behaviour would be instead be detrimental to them.
People can have many many reasons for not wanting sex, ranging from mere embarrassment, to yes, indeed, some sense of 'disgust' with these matters, for the many people that regard sexuality as something they are scared of, something that they may feel pales in comparison to matters such emotional side of relationships, and as such, find such actions in said matters, seemingly morally questionnable. However, these thoughts must be accepted, and ultimately confronted, sex cannot be forced upon them.
Indeed, I feel that those people that tend to go out to 'get laid' are the very ones that suffer the most emotionally, yes, it may be that they are seemingly confronting their so called 'fear' of sex, attempting to marginalise it as an issue for them, but in terms of neglect, these people are neglecting their emotional side, they are diverting their attention and energy away from it, away from what I feel really should matter.
This is one of the reasons I bring up this topic, the notion of being a stud, the seemingly widespread notion that women can and should be used as sex objects, the sex culture that seems to be being increasingly engrained into our culture, I feel, is ultimately damaging and is an issue that need and should be addressed.
I can admit that I might be a emotionally immature, but at least I am not doing things I ultimately do not want, I may see it as 'morally questionable', shameful, and such, certainly, to the extend of being outside a loving and nurturing relationship, but I have perfectly reasonable reasons to think such things.
Originally posted by Bad wolfI think you're mixing too things here, having sex and having a relationship. -although they often go together, they're completely separate things. one doesn't follow from the other, and anyone assuming they will, is just setting themself up for trouble. and I guess that's what you're talking about?
For the completion of the goal of making money, you cannot deny that these people must also make the aim of having sex with these people, regardless of whether they really want to do such things or not, they have to make this aim, for otherwise, they wouldn't be going out to these so called 'red light districts' or where ever else they find themselves, in o ...[text shortened]... nurturing relationship, but I have perfectly reasonable reasons to think such things.
and about sex being engrained to our culture, it was there far earlier than any culture. it's what we are (well most of us at least), it can't be taken out of us. you can try to repress it, but it won't stay repressed. maybe that's the real reason why we see sex in the most ridiculous contexts nowadays?
and for what it's worth, I don't think you are immature. you're just about exactly where someone your age is supposed to be. we've all been there, and in just a few years (which will seem to have gone in a flash) you'll think back and chuckle at how innocent you were. it's part of the program, enjoy while it lasts.
oh, I just realized that a lot of this is also about the good ol' "why do nice guys always finnish last" question. and the ultimate answer for that is: that's the way the women choose it to be. we really don't have much say in that one.