Go back
Mooks

Mooks

General


Mooks

1 edit

Originally posted by Frank Burns
"Derogatory term to describe an undesirable individual..." -Urban Slang

Shame on you, Dad!


😞

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
"Derogatory term to describe an undesirable individual..." -Urban Slang

Shame on you, Dad!


😞
They won't let me use my normal vulgar language here. Just flinging my two cents in...


Originally posted by Frank Burns
They won't let me use my normal vulgar language here. Just flinging my two cents in...
Will you be picking a lucky number in the "Second Free Member Subscription contest"? Hope you win!

P.S. Love & Hugs to Mum.


Originally posted by Frank Burns
They won't let me use my normal vulgar language here. Just flinging my two cents in...
Wait, here's your change. 😛

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Frank Burns
They won't let me use my normal vulgar language here. Just flinging my two cents in...
Man you are soooo Frank.

3 edits

Originally posted by Frank Burns
Wonder if the presence or absence of "Mooks" is in any way related to forum poster thread creation activity.

RHP GENERAL FORUM BIRTH RATE TREND:

OCTOBER:
77 Active Threads / 13 Days = 5.92 / Day... 5.92 / 2.16 = 2.74 or an August to October increase of 174% 🙂

SEPTEMBER: 85 Active Threads / 30 Days = 2.83 / Day

AUGUST: 67 Active Threads / 31 Days = 2.16 /Day 🙁

Note: Believe an internet site's forum poster volume becomes the basis of potential advertiser decisions. More posts and threads = more attractive the RHP Option
and Advertiser Revenues to RHP. Sheds a new light on the necessity for a consistently firm and fair site policy regarding poster behavior and banning policy. gb
.

1 edit

More is not better if the threads are self-aggrandizing crap. Where does quality of content fit into your equation? Can quality be accounted for as we look at threads over time? Maybe not - just asking.


Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
Believe an internet site's forum poster volume becomes the basis of potential advertiser decisions. More posts and threads = more attractive the RHP Option
and Advertiser Revenues to RHP. Sheds a new light on the necessity for a consistently firm and fair site policy regarding poster behavior and banning policy. gb
Volume means nothing if it only involves a handful of posters. A large number of different posters, even with
smaller volume, would do more to attract advertisers.

And bear in mind that subscribers are shielded from ads. Count the non-subscribers who post, not the threads.


Originally posted tiby mercurial

More is not better if the threads are self-aggrandizing crap. Where does quality of content fit into your equation? Can quality be accounted for as we look at threads over time? Maybe not - just asking.
As usual, a good question (almost as good as the ones you asked in our second contest thread, which you've never commented on). Of course quality matters... in a subjective sense since reader standards vary and, I think, tend to be somewhat relative to taste any maturity. Crap is often less defined by actual content than by the prevailing perceptions and nick of the member. IMO.
.


Originally posted by HandyAndy

Volume means nothing if it only involves a handful of posters. A large number of different posters, even with
smaller volume, would do more to attract advertisers.

And bear in mind that subscribers are shielded from ads. Count the non-subscribers who post, not the threads.
Advertisers examine volume. The advertiser's focal point on cereal boxes, billboards, television and internet sites is what's referred to as 'eyeballs' in the trade.
Subscriber/non-subscriber mix may be a factor; however, once any particular base is defined and established the percentage difference becomes irrelevant.
.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
As usual, a good question (almost as good as the ones you asked in our second contest thread, which you've never commented on). Of course quality matters... in a subjective sense since reader standards vary and, I think, tend to be somewhat relative to taste any maturity. Crap is often less defined by actual content than by the prevailing perceptions and nick of the member. IMO.
.
I didn't say quality matters. For ad response, quantity matters.


Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
As usual, a good question (almost as good as the ones you asked in our second contest thread, which you've never commented on). Of course quality matters... in a subjective sense since reader standards vary and, I think, tend to be somewhat relative to taste any maturity. Crap is often less defined by actual content than by the prevailing perceptions and nick of the member. IMO.
.
This is where we disagree Grandfather.

Crap is crap even if no one reads it or no one comments on it.

There is a lot of writing available to us now with the ubiquitous interwebs. In the isolation of your room at the home, you can read ancient and current writing from known and anonymous sources. You are a smart guy - you know crap when you read it and you know good writing. You don't need critics to choose for you.

Many posters here put thought into the words they choose and how those words work together - even when they are just going for a quick laugh.

Others do not.

Others want the attention on themselves rather than their words. A good author does not get in between their words and their readers.

2 edits

Originally posted by HandyAndy
I didn't say quality matters. For ad response, quantity matters.
Two mice fell into a bucket of cream. One drowned. The other struggled so hard the cream turned into butter.

3 edits

Originally posted by mercurial
This is where we disagree Grandfather.

Crap is crap even if no one reads it or no one comments on it.

There is a lot of writing available to us now with the ubiquitous interwebs. In the isolation of your room at the home, you can read ancient and current writing from known and anonymous sources. You are a smart guy - you know crap when you read it s rather than their words. A good author does not get in between their words and their readers.
What matters to advertisers and potential advertisers is sheer volume and volume trend. Granted that crap peddlers,
circus hucksters and inane posters squatting around the sandbox eventually drive legitimate posters away. Agree?

P.S. #1 Grandson, how about playing the role of Portia and remove Grandpappy from your Iggy. He's motivated to behave.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.