Go back
Movie Talk

Movie Talk

General

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by LivingLegend
Hey! I'm trying to sound mature here!πŸ˜›

Olav
Maturity, thats just knowing what to say and how to act when you meet the three hot girls walk in tight pantsπŸ˜›

Andrew

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by T1000
The sad thing is that if I was to go on about Xena or whatever it is you refer to you'd still run with it and jump on it. Oh you poor man. On the contrary Robert. A very worthwhile exercise in setting someone up.

While you get your kicks and smiles in having phony unnecessarily aggressive word battles in the clan forums in "maniacal clan leader mode" I p ...[text shortened]... ifferent people, different ways of "playing the game".

T1000
Leader of The Bad Bishops

A very spirited counterattack, I must say. You have proven yourself to be a valiant opponent and I relinquish the field to you, sir. But I do not think your way of "playing the game" is all that different.

-Rob (not Robert)
Leader of the Freethinkers

Vote Up
Vote Down

Best film at the movies has to be The Matrix Reloaded. Partly because I won tickets to the Belfast Premier but seriously excellent. Can't wait for the next installment in November. On DVD I have just seen an Australian film, Rabbit Proof Fence. Any Australians with an opinion about it. For music people check out the soundtrack by the incomparable Peter Gabriel. The film itself was an eye-openner into the aboriginal struggle in the mid 1900's up until the 1970's😠

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

"The Hours" would get my vote. One of those sort of brutally uplifting films πŸ™‚

2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by thepunter
On DVD I have just seen an Australian film, Rabbit Proof Fence. Any Australians with an opinion about it. For music people check out the soundtrack by the incomparable Peter Ga itself was an eye-openner into the aboriginal struggle in the mid 1900's up until the 1970's😠
I saw RPF last year, and thought it was a really good movie about a major social issue here in Australia. For those who haven't seen it, the film is set in the time of the 'stolen generation', up until the mid-20C or so. The 'stolen generation' relates to the practice of removing Aboriginal children from their families to live with white people. The idea was that they would become 'assimilated' into white society. It sounds medieval today, but i think at the time, the government thought they were helping them (this comes across in the film, i think). Australia really does have some black spots on its history - Aboriginals didn't get the vote until the 1960s and up until about the same time, there was a 'white Australia' immigration policy. things have changed in a way, but Aboriginal communities (generally) still experience very much higher rates of unemployment, substance abuse, poor health, incarcaration, domestic and sexual violence, and poverty than the wider population. the current conservative government doesn't seem particularly sympathetic to their plight. if you enjoyed RPF, i recommend 'Yolngu Boy' as well...
David
PS as for 'the aboriginal struggle in the mid 1900's up until the 1970's', i would suggest that the struggle actually began with the first white settlement in 1788...
PPS I think Aboriginals had the vote in some states until Fedewration in 1901, when they lost it for the next 60-70 or so years. Something like that...

Vote Up
Vote Down

Has anybody seen that film about the life of Mexican painter Frida Kahlo? It's a lot better than Pollock, IMHO. Are there any other movies about the lives of famous painters? I think I've seen one on Toulouse Lautrec, but i can't remember what it is called...

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by dfm65
Has anybody seen that film about the life of Mexican painter Frida Kahlo? It's a lot better than Pollock, IMHO. Are there any other movies about the lives of famous painters? I think I've seen one on Toulouse Lautrec, but i can't remember what it is called...
There's always Lust For Life, starring Kirk Douglas and Anthony Quinn, which is about Vincent Van Gogh. That was a good movie. Then there was Basquiat, about Jean Michel Basquiat, which had David Bowie playing Andy Warhol. I thought that was also a good movie.

I'll have to disagree with your assessment of Pollock, however. I thought that was a fine film.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by rwingett
I'll have to disagree with your assessment of [b]Pollock, however. I thought that was a fine film.[/b]
I have to admit, it DID encourage me to go see Blue Poles again. That's the only Pollock i've seen 'live' so to speak. I thought the film was quite good, but enjoyed the FK movie more. One thing i would have liked to have seen come out more in Pollock is the slightly artificial nature of his fame. As the theory goes, the Cold War hunt for a contemporary 'great American painter' was on, and Pollock became the annointed one, much as Faulkner was apparently singled out for literary fame decades after his work was first published, for similarly politically-tinged reasons.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by dfm65
I have to admit, it DID encourage me to go see Blue Poles again. That's the only Pollock i've seen 'live' so to speak. I thought the film was quite good, but enjoyed the FK movie more. One thing i would have liked to have seen come out more in Pollock is the slightly artificial nature of his fame. As the theory goes, the Cold War hunt for a contemporary ' ...[text shortened]... erary fame decades after his work was first published, for similarly politically-tinged reasons.
I've never heard that one before. I think Pollock richly deserved the accolades he won. He helped usher in the whole abstract expressionist movement, along with artists like Mark Rothko, Franz Kline, Adolph Gottlieb, and others. I think his fame may have been helped along by his erratic lifestyle and untimely death. He fit the public's perception of the "tortured artist". But I don't think his art would continue to resonate as much as it does today if he had been politically promoted.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by rwingett
I've never heard that one before. I think Pollock richly deserved the accolades he won. He helped usher in the whole abstract expressionist movement, along with artists like Mark Rothko, Franz Kline, Adolph Gottlieb, and others. I think his fame may have been helped along by his erratic lifestyle and untimely death. He fit the public's perception of the ...[text shortened]... is art would continue to resonate as much as it does today if he had been politically promoted.
I'm not claiming that he was an untalented hack, or anything of the sort, merely that the art 'fame game' is such that getting an influential critic onside seems pretty important to the process. In fact, despite my earlier posting, i think this did come across a bit in the movie. As you point out, he fitted the public perception of the tortured artist so he was ideal fodder for the whole fame making machinery. i guess the question here is: does talent=fame in the art world? i don't think it does. as for abstract expressionism, well i enjoy it but this is an age when monkeys and elephant art can be mistaken for that done by humans, so who knows?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by dfm65
I saw RPF last year, and thought it was a really good movie about a major social issue here in Australia. For those who haven't seen it, the film is set in the time of the 'stolen generation', up until the mid-20C or so. The 'stolen generation' relates to the practice of removing Aboriginal children from their families to live with white people. The idea ...[text shortened]... il Fedewration in 1901, when they lost it for the next 60-70 or so years. Something like that...
I will look out for/get that film.
Thanks.
Linda

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by misslead
I will look out for/get that film.
Thanks.
Linda
no worries. btw, the rpf of the title is a fence thousands of kilometres long built to control a rabbit plague. the Aboriginal children who are taken from their family use it to guide themselves back to their community. historical sidenote: eventually the rabbit disease myxamatosis was used to wipe out most of the rabbits.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by dfm65
no worries. btw, the rpf of the title is a fence thousands of kilometres long built to control a rabbit plague. the Aboriginal children who are taken from their family use it to guide themselves back to their community. historical sidenote: eventually the rabbit disease myxamatosis was used to wipe out most of the rabbits.
Does that mean that Australia has finally dealt with its rabbit problem?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Acolyte
Does that mean that Australia has finally dealt with its rabbit problem?
I'm afraid not. Myxamatosis was a failed experiment and rabbits are still terrorising farmers all over Australia. They also tried introducing foxes to control the rabbits, but unfortunately the foxes found native Australia wildlife easier to catch. What a mess...