Reviled by POTUS of course, his book just came out 'Facts and Fears''.
A former General and director of intelligence for presidents from JFK to Obama, knew AND TOLD TRUMP 3 months before the election the Russians were colluding.
Of course totally denied. But he showed the Russians basically started the anti-Hillary campaign with LITERALLY thousands of fake social media accounts and also LITERALLY millions of tweets with very similar wording from the crap Trump was promoting and the Russian fake media and tweets.
That the Russians managed to reach 120 MILLION American voters, alarming since only 140 million voted at all.
The election was won by only 80,000 votes and the Russians SPECIFICALLY targeted 3 swing states, Ohio being one and CERTAINLY without a shadow of doubt swung the election in favor of Trump.
He can say those things now that he is 'firmly retired' as he puts it.
The amount of absolute corruption stems DIRECTLY from Trump who had to know full well what was going on.
The Russians STARTED the anti-Hillary campaign and Clapper knew it.
So OF COURSE tomorrow Clapper will be the next Trump enemy and will be OF COURSE with ZERO doubt to be reviled, a total liar and so on and so forth.
Also the fact Republicans, like Nunez DEMANDING FBI documents revealing the identity of the informant who talked to those three Trump dudes, now outed by congress shakes the very foundations of law enforcement: YOU DON"T REVEAL SOURCES. If you do, what exactly do you say to the thousands of confidential potential informants around the world, 'Oh yeah, we have your back, your identity is secret'.
So the Russians have succeeded beyond their wildest dreams, undermined the foundations of the American democracy and it will take a LONG time for the US to recover IF EVER.
This is the saddest episode in American history without a doubt and those who support trump have been so duped they don't even know it.
So OF COURSE those Trumpites here will attack me, Clapper and the book in their misguided zeal to protect this POTUS I have always said to be a narcissistic sociopath and now proven deal maker with Putin and we now know Putin has manipulated Trump most skillfully and that immoral BASTARD TRUMP doesn't even know it.
- Joined
- 06 Nov 15
- Moves
- 41301
Originally posted by @shallow-blueI saw James Clapper on Rachel Maddow last night.
Take it to Debates, Spanky.
He's very credible. He's revealing the truth behind... Trump's treason.
Originally posted by @sonhouseAwwwww, look at all the little Trumptards running to his defense.
Reviled by POTUS of course, his book just came out 'Facts and Fears''.
A former General and director of intelligence for presidents from JFK to Obama, knew AND TOLD TRUMP 3 months before the election the Russians were colluding.
Of course totally denied. But he showed the Russians basically started the anti-Hillary campaign with LITERALLY thousands o ...[text shortened]... Putin has manipulated Trump most skillfully and that immoral BASTARD TRUMP doesn't even know it.
(Yes, I'm talking about the downthumbs.)
It would be funny if it weren't so pathetic.
Originally posted by @wolfe63The bit about congress releasing the name of a confidential informant is earth shattering, rocking the foundations of law. So who will willingly become an informant now that our own government outs informants because they think it politically expedient to do so.
Pathetic and actually kind of disturbing.
It is crap like this that ended the Roman empire and here we are 2000 years later looking at the endgame of American power.
- Joined
- 06 Nov 15
- Moves
- 41301
Originally posted by @sonhouse“No one could have imagined that the 21st-century catastrophe to befall the USA, the most debasing of disasters, would appear not, say, in the terrifying guise of an Orwellian Big Brother but in the ominously ridiculous commedia dell’arte figure of the boastful buffoon.”
The bit about congress releasing the name of a confidential informant is earth shattering, rocking the foundations of law. So who will willingly become an informant now that our own government outs informants because they think it politically expedient to do so.
It is crap like this that ended the Roman empire and here we are 2000 years later looking at the endgame of American power.
Philip Roth
Originally posted by @wolfe63how to light a fire using only words...
“No one could have imagined that the 21st-century catastrophe to befall the USA, the most debasing of disasters, would appear not, say, in the terrifying guise of an Orwellian Big Brother but in the ominously ridiculous commedia dell’arte figure of the boastful buffoon.”
Philip Roth
Originally posted by @wolfe63RIP Philip Roth
“No one could have imagined that the 21st-century catastrophe to befall the USA, the most debasing of disasters, would appear not, say, in the terrifying guise of an Orwellian Big Brother but in the ominously ridiculous commedia dell’arte figure of the boastful buffoon.”
Philip Roth
Originally posted by @sonhouseThe Democrats rocked the foundations of law by using an informant to spy on Trump.
The bit about congress releasing the name of a confidential informant is earth shattering, rocking the foundations of law. So who will willingly become an informant now that our own government outs informants because they think it politically expedient to do so.
It is crap like this that ended the Roman empire and here we are 2000 years later looking at the endgame of American power.
That's going to come back and bite them.
Originally posted by @captain-strangeYou are so full of shyte it is pathetic.
The Democrats rocked the foundations of law by using an informant to spy on Trump.
That's going to come back and bite them.
You may have heard of WATERGATE?
Originally posted by @captain-strangeEr, were you even BORN back then? It was more than spying. It was active burglar activity.
That's a very good comparison son.
One party spying on another trying to get an edge.
Besides why don't you provide your evidence it was 'spying' for political gains. Congress just had a session about that with no proof AND WH lawyers got to attend. That ok with you? Giving up prosecution information to the person accused, in this case POTUS?