Go back
one-world govt

one-world govt

General

Vote Up
1
Vote Down
-1

Originally posted by mercurial
Provocative.

This site should have a special forum where the people who pay to support this site and the freeloaders (not you Trev don't even start) could get together debate drivel such as this.

Maybe I will send the idea over to Site Ideas.
Not being funny mate but f888 off nob head.

PS it's called the general forum.

Vote Up
Vote Down
-1

Originally posted by apathist
If one-world govt is bad, then the USA should break into 50 new countries.
Are you even old enough to be in here?

CRIPES!

Vote Up
1
Vote Down

Oh don't be mean I am just playing. Nob head? That is not nice.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by mercurial
Oh don't be mean I am just playing. Nob head? That is not nice.
?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by mercurial
Provocative.

This site should have a special forum where the people who pay to support this site and the freeloaders (not you Trev don't even start) could get together debate drivel such as this.

Maybe I will send the idea over to Site Ideas.
"This site should have a special forum where the people who pay to support this site and the freeloaders (not you Trev don't even start) could get together debate drivel such as this."

But is'nt that exactly what we are doing, I know why dont we get them to provide some online chess boards and we could play the odd game between drivel.

Vote Up
1
Vote Down

Originally posted by apathist
If one-world govt is bad, then the USA should break into 50 new countries.
Why stop there? Why not continue that line of reasoning until we achieve total anarchy?

Where would you draw the line?

2 edits
Vote Up
1
Vote Down
-1

Sorry. What I meant was, and now back to the issue. Looking for meaningful responses.

edit: meant to replace my melt-down. I hate getting pissed off. Bothers me. I'd rather be calm and collected. Easier to take dead aim that way.

Vote Up
Vote Down
-1

Originally posted by Maxwell Smart
Why stop there? Why not continue that line of reasoning until we achieve total anarchy?

Where would you draw the line?
But that is my point. We should advocate one-world govt because of what you just said.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by apathist
But that is my point. We should advocate one-world govt because of what you just said.
Absolutes are dangerous to either extreme. The only reasonable debate is in where to strike the balance.

Vote Up
1
Vote Down

Originally posted by Maxwell Smart
Absolutes are dangerous to either extreme. The only reasonable debate is in where to strike the balance.
What are you saying? Human civilization must not ever get on the same page because that would violate the idea of the middle-way?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by mercurial
Oh don't be mean I am just playing. Nob head? That is not nice.
...and your comment is really really nice, albieit a wee bit patronising? Yup the GF is just for you isn't it? Have it all to ye self. Blah.

Oh and 'Mercurial'? Who calls you that other than yourself? No one, I trust.

Vote Up
1
Vote Down
-1

Originally posted by Sicilian Sausage
...and your comment is really really nice, albieit a wee bit patronising? Yup the GF is just for you isn't it? Have it all to ye self. Blah.

Oh and 'Mercurial'? Who calls you that other than yourself? No one, I trust.
Well not patronizing, but yes probably needlessly picking a fight. No offense intended I was just joining the game. Obviously the GF is not for me. Honestly - I don't get it. But that is pretty obvious by this point isn't it.

An old girlfriend called me mecurial and you are right - I liked it.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by apathist
What are you saying? Human civilization must not ever get on the same page because that would violate the idea of the middle-way?
The whole Human race on the same page, sounds like a recipe for stagnation on so many levels.

Conflict is essential for growth and change, you will be advocating inter generational harmony next.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by kevcvs57
The whole Human race on the same page, sounds like a recipe for stagnation on so many levels.

Conflict is essential for growth and change, ...
Good point. We have no chance against the zombie apocalypse or the alien invasion unless we like to fight. But why is our whole world weaker than the parts?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Options:

A) Decentralized extreme- anarchy.
B) Centralized extreme- global monarch
C) Anything in between

If you prefer option A or B, then we will have to agree to disagree. If you prefer option C, then we will have to agree to disagree as to where to draw the line.

It's like a glass of good Scotch. Not enough ice and the Scotch is too warm. Too much ice and the Scotch is watered down. So how much ice is just right? I'm going to go do some research...