Originally posted by HandyAndyyou have claimed and here it is again that i have admitted cheating. Hear is your text.
Do your clan opponents consider you a cheater? Yes or no.
'As an admitted cheater' - Randolph Gandoplh
where have i admitted being a cheat as you have claimed Randolph?
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 116939
30 May 16
Originally posted by divegeesterCorrected.
More resources here Thread 59394
More resources here Thread 159394
Originally posted by HandyAndyLets take your post apart piece by piece, shall we.
Flounder over to the Clans Forum and count the "endorsements" from the other players,
Many of them believe you are cheating and colluding to rig games. Why would they lie?
'Many of them believe' - logical fallacy number one. A rather transparent argumentum ad populum (appeal to the people), many people believe it therefore it is true, for example, eight out of ten cats prefer kittikat, its therefore the best catfood, or ten thousand Elvis fans cannot be wrong proving that Elvis is the greatest!
cheating - despite being asked countless times none of those whom you cite can produce the rule that has allegedly been broken. Logically if there are no rules broken we are free to ask in what sense can it be construed as cheating. Perhaps you can tell us but I somehow doubt it.
colluding - allegations of collusion abound but once again there is no site rule against collusion in clan matches. One is therefore free to ask, that being the case then what rules are they adhering to so that they are outraged? is it some fantasy rule that they have fabricated in their own minds? As a fantasy merchant yourself you will no doubt be able to resonate with some fantasy rule.
why would they lie - contains assumed values, that they are lying and seeks to present a false dilemma in that it fails to make room for other possibilities, for example, that they are delusional and believe nothing but their own propaganda.
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 116939
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI don't care whether or not you are dishonest in your chess dealings here at RHP.
Lets take your post apart piece by piece, shall we.
'Many of them believe' - logical fallacy number one. A rather transparent argumentum ad populum (appeal to the people), many people believe it therefore it is true, for example, eight out of ten cats prefer kittikat, its therefore the best catfood, or ten thousand Elvis fans cannot be wrong provi ...[text shortened]... ssibilities, for example, that they are delusional and believe nothing but their own propaganda.
What I do find interesting however, is that wherever you go here, you seem to have a poor reputation for a lack of integrity, one way or another.
Originally posted by divegeesterYes indeed its always disappointing to see the Pharisee in you rise to the surface for even the Christ himself was subject to vile insinuations (not of course that I am comparing myself to Jesus) 'The Son of Man came eating and drinking, and you say, 'Here is a glutton and a drunkard, a friend of tax collectors and sinners.' I can see you now geester, standing there, finger pointing. moralizing over, 'that Jesus', 'a friend of tax collectors and sinners', has he no integrity? The shame of it!
I don't care whether or not you are dishonest in your chess dealings here at RHP.
What I do find interesting however, is that wherever you go here, you seem to have a poor reputation for a lack of integrity, one way or another.
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 116939
30 May 16
Originally posted by robbie carrobieAre you once again comparing your self-inflicted RHP ignominy to the sufferings of Christ?
Yes indeed its always disappointing to see the Pharisee in you rise to the surface for even the Christ himself was subject to vile insinuations (not of course that I am comparing myself to Jesus) 'The Son of Man came eating and drinking, and you say, 'Here is a glutton and a drunkard, a friend of tax collectors and sinners.' I can see you now geest ...[text shortened]... r, 'that Jesus', 'a friend of tax collectors and sinners', has he no integrity? The shame of it!