Pathology in the Hundred Acre Wood: a neurodevelopmental
>perspective on A.A. Milne
>
>
>Sarah E. Shea, Kevin Gordon, Ann Hawkins, Janet Kawchuk and Donna Smith
>Sarah-the-Shea, Ann-the-Hawkins, Janet-the-Kawchuk and Donna-the-Smith are
>with the Division of Developmental Pediatrics and Kevin-the-Gordon is with
>the Division of Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University,
>Halifax, NS.
>Abstract
>Somewhere at the top of the Hundred Acre Wood a little boy and his bear
>play. On the surface it is an innocent world, but on closer examination by
>our group of experts we find a forest where neurodevelopmental and
>psychosocial problems go unrecognized and untreated.
>
>
>
>On the surface it is an innocent world: Christopher Robin, living in a
>beautiful forest surrounded by his loyal animal friends. Generations of
>readers of A.A. Milne's Winnie-the-Pooh stories have enjoyed these
>seemingly benign tales.1,2 However, perspectives change with time, and it
>is clear to our group of modern neurodevelopmentalists that these are in
>fact stories of Seriously Troubled Individuals, many of whom meet DSM-IV3
>criteria for significant disorders (Table 1). We have done an exhaustive
>review of the works of A.A. Milne and offer our conclusions about the
>inhabitants of the Hundred Acre Wood in hopes that our observations will
>help the medical community understand that there is a Dark Underside to
>this world.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>We begin with Pooh. This unfortunate bear embodies the concept of
>comorbidity. Most striking is his Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
>(ADHD), inattentive subtype. As clinicians, we had some debate about
>whether Pooh might also demonstrate significant impulsivity, as witnessed,
>for example, by his poorly thought out attempt to get honey by disguising
>himself as a rain cloud. We concluded, however, that this reflected more on
>his comorbid cognitive impairment, further aggravated by an obsessive
>fixation on honey. The latter, of course, has also contributed to his
>significant obesity. Pooh's perseveration on food and his repetitive
>counting behaviours raise the diagnostic possibility of Obsessive
>Compulsive Disorder (OCD). Given his coexisting ADHD and OCD, we question
>whether Pooh may over time present with Tourette's syndrome. Pooh is also
>clearly described as having Very Little Brain. We could not confidently
>diagnose microcephaly, however, as we do not know whether standards
> exist for the head circumference of the brown bear. The cause of Pooh's
>poor brain growth may be found in the stories themselves. Early on we see
>Pooh being dragged downstairs bump, bump, bump, on the back of his head.
>Could his later cognitive struggles be the result of a type of Shaken Bear
>Syndrome?
>Pooh needs intervention. We feel drugs are in order. We cannot but wonder
>how much richer Pooh's life might be were he to have a trial of low-dose
>stimulant medication. With the right supports, including methylphenidate,
>Pooh might be fitter and more functional and perhaps produce (and remember)
>more poems.
>I take a PILL-tiddley pom It keeps me STILL-tiddley pom, It keeps me
>STILL-tiddley pom Not fiddling.
>And what of little Piglet? Poor, anxious, blushing, flustered little
>Piglet. He clearly suffers from a Generalized Anxiety Disorder. Had he been
>appropriately assessed and his condition diagnosed when he was young, he
>might have been placed on an antipanic agent, such as paroxetine, and been
>saved from the emotional trauma he experienced while attempting to trap
>heffalumps.
>Pooh and Piglet are at risk for additional self-esteem injury because of
>the chronic dysthymia of their neighbour, Eeyore. What a sad life that
>donkey lives. We do not have sufficient history to diagnose this as an
>inherited, endogenous depression or to know whether some early trauma
>contributed to his chronic negativism, low energy and anhe(haw)donia.
>Eeyore would benefit greatly from an antidepressant, perhaps combined with
>individual therapy. Maybe with a little fluoxetine, Eeyore might see the
>humour in the whole tail-losing episode. Even if a patch of St. John's wort
>grew near his thistles, the forest could ring with a braying laugh.
>Our neurodevelopmental group agrees about poor Owl: obviously bright, but
>dyslexic. His poignant attempts to cover up for his phonological deficits
>are similar to what we see day in and day out in others so afflicted. If
>only his condition had been identified early and he received more intensive
>support!
>We especially worry about baby Roo. It is not his impulsivity or
>hyperactivity that concerns us, as we feel that those are probably age
>appropriate. We worry about the environment in which he is developing. Roo
>is growing up in a single-parent household, which puts him at high risk for
>Poorer Outcome. We predict we will someday see a delinquent, jaded,
>adolescent Roo hanging out late at night at the top of the forest, the
>ground littered with broken bottles of extract of malt and the butts of
>smoked thistles. We think that this will be Roo's reality, in part because
>of a second issue. Roo's closest friend is Tigger, who is not a good Role
>Model. Peer influences strongly affect outcome.
>We acknowledge that Tigger is gregarious and affectionate, but he has a
>recurrent pattern of risk-taking behaviours. Look, for example, at his
>impulsive sampling of unknown substances when he first comes to the Hundred
>Acre Wood. With the mildest of provocation he tries honey, haycorns and
>even thistles. Tigger has no knowledge of the potential outcome of his
>experimentation. Later we find him climbing tall trees and acting in a way
>that can only be described as socially intrusive. He leads Roo into danger.
>Our clinical group has had its own debate about what the best medication
>might be for Tigger. Some of us have argued that his behaviours, occurring
>in a context of obvious hyperactivity and impulsivity, would suggest the
>need for a stimulant medication. Others have wondered whether clonidine
>might be helpful, or perhaps a combination of the two. Unfortunately we
>could not answer the question as scientifically as we would have liked
>because we could find only human studies in the
> literature.
>Even if we were able to help Tigger, we would still have the problem of
>Roo's growing up with a single parent. Kanga is noted to be somewhat
>overprotective. Could her possessiveness of Roo relate to a previous run-in
>with social services? And where will Kanga be in the future? It is highly
>likely that she will end up older, blowsier, struggling to look after
>several joeys conceived in casual relationships with different fathers,
>stuck at a dead end with inadequate financial resources. But perhaps we are
>being too gloomy. Kanga may prove to be one of those exceptional single
>mothers who show a natural resilience — an ability, if we may say so, to
>bounce back. Maybe Kanga will pass her high school equivalency test, earn a
>university degree and maybe even get an MBA. Perhaps some day Kanga will
>buy the Hundred Acre Wood and develop it into a gated community of $500 000
>homes. But that is not likely to happen, particularly in a social context
>that does not appear to value education and
> provides no strong female leadership.
>What leadership there is in the Hundred Acre Wood is simply that offered by
>one small boy, Christopher Robin. Our group believes that Christopher Robin
>has not exhibited any diagnosable condition as yet, but we are concerned
>about several issues. There is the obvious problem of a complete absence of
>parental supervision, not to mention the fact that this child is spending
>his time talking to animals. We also noted in the stories early signs of
>difficulty with academics and felt that E.H. Shepard's illustrations
>suggest possible future gender identity issues for this child. The more
>psychoanalytical member in our group indicated that there could be some
>Freudian meaning to his peculiar naming of his bear as Winnie-the-Pooh.
>Finally, we turn to Rabbit. We note his tendency to be extraordinarily
>self-important and his odd belief system that he has a great many relations
>(many of other species!) and friends. He seems to have an overriding need
>to organize others, often against their will, into new groupings, with
>himself always at the top of the reporting structure. We believe that he
>has missed his calling, as he clearly belongs in senior-level hospital
>administration.
>Somewhere at the top of the forest a little boy and his bear play. Sadly,
>the forest is not, in fact, a place of enchantment, but rather one of
>disenchantment, where neurodevelopmental and psychosocial problems go
>unrecognized and untreated. It is unfortunate that an Expotition was never
>Organdized to a Child Development Clinic.
>
> Figure. Photo by:
>
>
>
>Footnotes
>Contributors: Sarah Shea was the principal author and contributed to the
>concept and writing of the article and analysis of the literature. Kevin
>Gordon, Ann Hawkins, Janet Kawchuk and Donna Smith contributed to the
>concept, the literature analysis and revision of the initial draft.
>Reprint requests to: Dr. Sarah E. Shea, Developmental Clinic, IWK Grace
>Health Centre, 5850 University Ave., Halifax NS B3J 3G9; fax 902 428-3284
taken from the canadian medical journal
Originally posted by villa68Yup, I have read it a long time ago...
Pathology in the Hundred Acre Wood: a neurodevelopmental
>perspective on A.A. Milne
>
>
>Sarah E. Shea, Kevin Gordon, Ann Hawkins, Janet Kawchuk and Donna Smith
>Sarah-the-Shea, Ann-the-Hawkins, Janet-the-Kawchuk and Donna-the-Smith a ...[text shortened]... 9; fax 902 428-3284
taken from the canadian medical journal
What stupid (and offensive) things can one person write only to publish a paper!
It's a sick perspective IMHO. Only to atract the attention of the academic (?) forum.
My regards
Indignated LittleBear
P.S.: Sarah Shea et al. : GET A LIFE, people! Please don't offend the *really* scientific comunity with this BS.
EDIT: Only spelling.