- Joined
- 06 Nov 15
- Moves
- 41301
Originally posted by @shallow-blueLennon and McCartney
What, compared to that selfish, arrogant t#$t Lennon?
Ying and Yang
Lennon was a poetic genius. He was also a troubled human being. Unresolved issues of childhood effect everyone differently. But, thanks to fate and fortune, Paul had the only kind of genius that John could abide: That born of sincere goodness. They were complementary.
And the world shall long be grateful.
20 Jul 18
Originally posted by @wolfe63And then of course there was George. Incomparable perhaps to the two main players, but when I were a lad and the band split, and the huge and pent - up creative energy of the 'All Things Must pass' album was released, I played it 'til the needle wore out.
Lennon and McCartney
Ying and Yang
Lennon was a poetic genius. He was also a troubled human being. Unresolved issues of childhood effect everyone differently. But, thanks to fate and fortune, Paul had the only kind of genius that John could abide: That born of sincere goodness. They were complementary.
And the world shall long be grateful.
20 Jul 18
Originally posted by @indonesia-philI agree. George was my favorite.
And then of course there was George. Incomparable perhaps to the two main players, but when I were a lad and the band split, and the huge and pent - up creative energy of the 'All Things Must pass' album was released, I played it 'til the needle wore out.
20 Jul 18
Originally posted by @shallow-blueI liked his music but I’m not a fan of him either, for similar reasons.
What, compared to that selfish, arrogant t#$t Lennon?
20 Jul 18
1 edit
Originally posted by @caissad4Yes a very decent man. He appeared to me to always look a little lost in the Beatles though; sort of happy to be there for the ride, but a bit “wtf!” at the same time.
I agree. George was my favorite.