@ghost-of-a-duke saidThen why could you not bring yourself to PM me and tell me to use a different pseudonym?
Completely untrue. We continued in a civil manner for a long while after the Chamber was created.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidBump for FMF.
I suspect a genuine friend would have asked in advance to change my name on a radio broadcast, especially at a time when things were not good between us. Why didn't you do that?
You have never answered that question.
@ghost-of-a-duke said1. Rusty-free zone and 2. Anti-Rusty club : a place where posters from the General Forum are syphoned off so that Very Rusty is excluded and ignored regardless of the consequences for the General Forum.
1. Rusty-free zone - A place where we don't talk about Rusty.
2. Anti-Rusty club - A place where we sit around saying bad things about Rusty.
How are they the same?
@ghost-of-a-duke saidI thought what I did was fine and humorous too. The show is made by a bunch of friends, after all. If I had wanted to be "malicious" ~ and I didn't ~ then there wouldn't have been any of your onions in the show, let alone two of them. I thought a spoonerized name for you and a spoonerized name for Phil was fine. You should have PM'd me.
I suspect a genuine friend would have asked in advance to change my name on a radio broadcast, especially at a time when things were not good between us. Why didn't you do that?
@ghost-of-a-duke saidWhy did you make your complaint to the radio station using a local government e-mail account? And why did you pretend it was CONFIDENTIAL when you did not send it to any named person but instead sent it to an account accessed by at least 40 different people at the radio station? What breach of the Data Protection Act were you referring to?
Do you know the difference between a threat and a warning?